<<Prev Next>> Scroll to Bottom
Stuff goes here
L1[02:03:57] ⇦
Quits: doskel (~doskel@2602:f927:1:200:2000::) (Ping timeout: 195
seconds)
L2[02:14:26] *** Joins: doskel
(~doskel@2602:f927:1:200:2000::) doskel
L3[02:38:28] <Corded> > <Michiyo>
@Forecaster Did you end up removing the Honeypot bot from …
L4[02:38:29]

<Forecaster> No?
L5[02:38:36]

<Forecaster> Should I have?
L6[02:39:45]

<Michiyo>
No, I just didn't see it last time I paid attention lol
L7[02:54:02] <Izzy> Hm, I wonder if the
reason all the LLM-extruded Lua I've seen is so dogshit is
because most of the Lua out there is written by literal children
for roblox, or whether it's just really fucking bad at doing
anything and I don't know other languages well enough to
notice when I am nonconsentually exposed to it.
L8[02:57:02] *** Joins: Hawk777
(~Hawk777@2605:1700:81c9:9c00:85a:6787:fa6e:be70) Hawk777
L9[04:53:29] <Izzy> Though, I guess that
would imply that the "right" training data could result
in it extruding good Lua, while ultimately it can't reason
about a problem, can't architect a solution, and can't go
"no, this is fucking stupid, let's try something
else"
L10[04:56:38]

<SpiderEveryOS> %tonk
L11[04:56:38] <MichiBot> Hooray!
SpiderEveryOS! You beat your own previous record of 0s (By 9h 9m
39s)! I hope you're happy!
L12[04:56:38] <MichiBot>
SpiderEveryOS's new record is 9h 9m 39s! No points gained for
stealing from yourself. (Lost out on 0.00916)
L13[04:58:57] ⇦
Quits: doskel (~doskel@2602:f927:1:200:2000::) (Ping timeout: 195
seconds)
L14[05:58:25] <Izzy> oh, the java CVE is
just the certs issue from the other day.
L15[06:04:45] ⇦
Quits: reborn (reborn@reborn.my.id) (Ping timeout: 195
seconds)
L16[06:10:41] ⇦
Quits: Hobbyboy (Hobbyboy@hobbyboy.co.uk) (Quit: The BNC has
broken!)
L17[06:11:38] *** Joins: Hobbyboy|BNC
(Hobbyboy@hobbyboy.co.uk) Hobbyboy
L18[06:11:43] ⇦
Quits: Hobbyboy|BNC (Hobbyboy@hobbyboy.co.uk) (Remote host closed
the connection)
L19[06:14:24] *** Joins: Hobbyboy|BNC
(Hobbyboy@hobbyboy.co.uk) Hobbyboy
L20[06:20:49] ⇦
Quits: dustinm`
(~dustinm@static.38.6.217.95.clients.your-server.de) (Ping timeout:
194 seconds)
L21[06:25:24] ⇨
Joins: dustinm`
(~dustinm@static.38.6.217.95.clients.your-server.de)
L22[06:32:43] *** Joins: doskel
(~doskel@2602:f927:1:200:2000::) doskel
L23[06:33:05] ⇨
Joins: reborn (reborn@reborn.my.id)
L24[07:12:39] ⇦
Quits: Hawk777 (~Hawk777@2605:1700:81c9:9c00:85a:6787:fa6e:be70)
(Quit: Leaving.)
L25[07:15:17] ⇦
Quits: jackie (~jackie@banana-new.kilobyte22.de) ()
L26[07:15:18] ⇦
Quits: nadja (~dequbed@banana-new.kilobyte22.de) (Quit:
bye!)
L27[07:15:18] ⇦
Quits: kilobyte (~kilobyte2@banana-new.kilobyte22.de) (Quit:
Bye)
L28[07:19:37] *** Joins: jackie
(~jackie@banana-new.kilobyte22.de) jackie
L29[07:19:37] zsh
sets mode: +v on jackie
L30[07:22:06] *** Joins: nadja
(~dequbed@banana-new.kilobyte22.de) dequbed
L31[07:28:16] *** Joins: kilobyte
(~kilobyte2@banana-new.kilobyte22.de) Stiepen
L32[07:28:16] zsh
sets mode: +v on kilobyte
L33[08:47:06]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> Did yall see this yet?
L35[08:51:47] <Izzy> that would be very
impressive if it weren't slop, instead it just inspires a
sense of dread
L36[08:52:18] <Izzy> maybe a sign I should
log off for the day
L37[08:57:01]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> i mean it isn't slop?
L38[08:57:02]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> slop would mean it was vibecoded
L39[08:58:22] <Izzy> any LLM output is
slop, no matter how closely supervised it is
L41[08:59:51]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> VS code has AI built in now, does that count
too
L43[09:00:02] <Corded> > <Toga's
Biggest Fan> +local
L45[09:00:19] <Izzy> locally made slop is
still slop
L46[09:00:26]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> damn thats crazy i guess I gotta rename my
variables by hand 🥀
L47[09:00:34]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> otherwise its slop
L48[09:00:43] <Izzy> if only there were
existing tools that did that
L49[09:00:53] <Izzy> surely no computer
user would ever know how to use their computer
L50[09:01:04] <Izzy> god forbid you have to
do a search-and-replace
L51[09:03:41]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> same end result, different tools
L52[09:03:41]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> just because one uses a neural network doesnt
magically make the work not be done
L53[09:03:58]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> 🤷
L54[09:05:13]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> (also, the ai points it out the moment the
variable name is changed, and I just check it's replacing the
right thing before clicking a green checkmark. It's literally
the same process as search and replace, but I dont have to punch it
in by hand)
L55[09:05:29] <Izzy> How's that boot
taste?
L56[09:05:48]

<Forecaster> it's the same, except
all the ethical issues
L57[09:06:00]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> 🤷
L58[09:06:14] <Izzy> it's not even the
same though, the slop machine extrudes the most dogshit code
I've ever seen
L59[09:06:35] <Izzy> miserable time
L60[09:06:36]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> even when its not doing code
L61[09:06:40]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> ?
L62[09:06:43]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> lol
L63[09:06:48]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> im fucking with you
L64[09:06:50]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> thats not a real question
L65[09:09:24]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> i get why people dislike generative ai
L66[09:09:24]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> but freaking out and calling code "slop"
the moment it even mentions AI assistance isn't productive or
condusive to an actual discussion regarding the ethics or
ecological side effects of using it
L67[09:10:14]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> vibe coding and selling ai-generated code are bad,
yes
L68[09:10:14]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> but using my IDE's built-in ai suggestion box
doesn't magically make everything touched by the IDE suddenly
slop
L69[09:10:52] <Izzy> congratulations,
everything you make is slop!
L70[09:11:13]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> so much for nuanced discussion i guess 🥀
L71[09:11:41] <Izzy> slop enthusiasts will
go "putting aside the ethical issues" as if that's a
thing one can do
L72[09:11:45] <Izzy> I'm not
interested
L73[09:11:49] <Izzy> enjoy your slop
L74[09:11:53]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> bro did NOT read what I said
L75[09:12:03]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> "productive or condusive to an actual
discussion regarding the ethics or ecological side effects of using
it"
L76[09:12:12] <Izzy> yeah, while defending
it??
L77[09:12:36] <Izzy> you're already
wasting my time with this, you're using it so you're not
interested in actual discussion of it, you just want to feel okay
with it
L78[09:12:58] <Izzy> gluh, this is a waste
of my time
L79[09:13:11] <Izzy> once again, enjoy your
slop :)
L80[09:13:13]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> what is your actual problem with it
L81[09:13:26]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> is it the ethics? because that's something
that can be discussed
L82[09:13:39]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> is it the ecological impact of generative ai? that
too can be discussed
L83[09:14:28]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> but blindly flailing and refusing to engage other
than calling it slop isn't a worthwhile thing to say
L84[09:15:06]

<LilyflowerFDL> Izzy: Rider comes with
some kind of AI completion engine that's wrong almost all the
time, I had to dig around in the settings to figure out how to turn
it off
L85[09:15:09] ⇨
Joins: lily (~Lily@58.84.227.106)
L86[09:15:16] <Izzy> lolol sounds about
right
L87[09:15:37] <lily> and by wrong I mean
it'd straight up suggest serilog instead of RT's built in
logger
L88[09:15:52] <lily> nevermind the fact
that serilog isn't available on the client
L89[09:16:00] <Izzy> I don't want to
dunk but my little rant ~8 hours ago was reading through some
extruded Lua and it was such a mess
L90[09:16:26]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> See, that's understandable
L91[09:16:43] <lily> I think my biggest
concern with that mod would be, like, the performance?
L92[09:16:45] <Izzy> took something,
quadrupled the size to fix a problem that could best be described
as "you were using it wrong"
L93[09:16:56] <Izzy> did so in the most
pants-on-head way possible
L94[09:17:18] <Izzy> not even the dumb
brute force way, complete nonsense that does work if you stand on
your head to look at it
L95[09:17:24] <lily> it feels like
something that'd be... I'd reach for the term
"artist programming" here but that doesn't apply
here for obvious reasons
L96[09:17:39] <lily> like how
spectrum's black hole chest was taking up 900uS/t
L97[09:18:12] <Corded> > <Izzy>
not even the dumb brute force way, complete nonsense that d…
L98[09:18:13]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> See, that just sounds like someone doing
vibecoding and blindly trying to get the AI to do all the work for
them
L99[09:18:24]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> (replying to izzy, im not sure if it gets that
across)
L100[09:18:36] <Izzy> you know how you can
do for i = start, end, increment? this used an unbounded while
loop, manually incremented a counter, and broke out of the loop at
the end
L101[09:18:42] <lily> what the fuck
L102[09:18:53]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> oh ew
L103[09:18:56] <lily> on a completely
different note I had to write an Xposed module yesterday to use my
yubikey with discord and uh. wow, it's basically just Android
Mixin huh
L104[09:19:14]

<Toga's
Biggest Fan> also that really could also just be a novice coder
who doesn't know you can do that
L105[09:19:15] <Izzy> which is very funny
but also damn you were happy to publish that??
L106[09:21:11] <Izzy> anyway. very cool.
hope that was worth boiling a lake and driving up the price of
memory 500% for, buddy.
L107[09:21:57] ⇦
Quits: s0cks (opensim@ds003.info) (Ping timeout: 201
seconds)
L108[09:52:58]
⇨ Joins: s0cks (opensim@ds003.info)
L109[09:53:31] <Corded> >
<Renno> reacted 👆 to <Toga's Biggest Fan> i get
why people dislike generative ai but freaking out and calling code
"slop"…
L110[09:54:30]

<Renno>
Will you boycott Linux and/or stop updating since the latest
versions are AI assisted in ~20% of code changes?
L111[09:57:39]

<Renno> Btw
computers and machines in general already had significant
ecological impacts well prior to AI in similar ways, its not like
we've been spamming it like crazy for like 30 or 40 years
straight beforehand right?
L112[10:02:18]

<Renno> Im
also particularly curious how from a Marxist perspective which I
would guess that you have, Izzy, how you are pro intellectual
property and anti theft of considering that intellectual property
from that perspective is considered as a capitalistic mechanism to
gatekeep humanities collection of knowledge. That knowledge was
stolen by
L113[10:02:18] <Corded> the AI companies
and has basically been redistributed to the world at scale through
the outputs of LLMs, which if I recall is aligned with Marxists
goals. Of course, if you aren't Marxist this doesn't
apply, but I would be surprised if you weren't aligned with
the signage in and around Niasmor on the SKS server
L114[10:18:01] <Corded> >
<Renno> reacted ☝️ to <Toga's Biggest Fan> but
blindly flailing and refusing to engage other than calling it slop
isn't a …
L115[10:46:59] ⇦
Quits: simon816 (~simon816@secondary.machine.simon816.com) (Quit:
ZNC 1.10.2 - https://znc.in)
L116[10:50:16] *** Joins: simon816
(~simon816@secondary.machine.simon816.com) simon816
L117[11:25:13] <Amanda> LLMs are a method
of taking the skilled and using it for wealth, while denying the
wealth to the skilled.
L118[11:26:09] *** Joins: RedstoneParkour
(~RedstoneP@109.36.230.114) RedstoneParkour
L119[11:26:12] <Amanda> There's a
reason every indipendent contractor I know charges at least double
for cleaning up LLM outputs.
L120[11:38:15] <Corded> >
<Amanda> LLMs are a method of taking the skilled and using
it for we…
L121[11:38:15]

<Renno>
I've met quite a few skilled people that have made significant
wealth from using them so uh
L122[11:41:12]

<Renno> and
by your own admission you're wrong, you literally just said
that they are making double for being skilled because of
LLMs.
L123[11:47:58] <Corded> >
<einBeo> fourth time's the charm
L125[11:48:22]

<einBeo> or
the meteor that's nearby, who knows, could be either
L126[11:50:39] <Corded> >
<einBeo> it also disappears when moving into a lootgames
dungeon chu…
L127[11:50:39]

<Renno>
well that's concerning for any of the long exploration robots
I was thinking about making
L128[11:50:53]

<Renno>
what is your robot supposed to do if it wasn't being deleted
by worldgen?
L129[11:53:03]

<einBeo>
get division sigil, thaumium pickaxe, iron, and some other metals
from thaumcraft dungeons (location reverse engineered from seed),
get enchantment table from a roguelike dungeon (using thaumium pick
to break it), activate division sigil, smelt the enchantment table,
make unstable ingots and obsidian sticks, make unbreakable
pickaxe
L130[11:53:33] <RedstoneParkour> would
perhaps pregenerating the chunk by having a chunkloading drone move
to it work?
L131[11:53:40] <Corded> >
<RedstoneParkour> would perhaps pregenerating the chunk by
having a chunkload…
L132[11:53:40]

<einBeo>
yes!
L133[11:54:17]

<einBeo>
that is actually a more general and lightweight solution than the
"generate a large part of the world" I was going
for
L134[11:55:06]

<einBeo> if
you want a general exploration robot, the Ingenuity Perseverance
pair seems like a great strategy
L135[11:56:42]

<Renno> so
you are using a chunk loader in the robot too?
L136[11:57:27]

<einBeo>
indeed
L137[11:57:45]

<einBeo>
that's how it goes off on its own for thousands of
blocks
L138[11:59:34]

<Renno>
have you measured its exact position in the chunk before it gets
deleted?
L139[11:59:41]

<einBeo>
it's inconsistent
L140[11:59:44]

<Renno>
and/or the time for that to happen?
L141[11:59:52]

<einBeo>
also inconsistent
L142[12:00:20]

<einBeo> I
believe it's due to inconsistencies on the chunkloading ticket
updates; the ticket covers a 3x3 region around the robot but is
only updated occaisionally
L143[12:00:22]

<Renno> is
time to success a big factor in this project or can it go a little
slower?
L144[12:01:35] <Amanda> @Renno
they're still probably charging less than the company spent in
tokens to make the mess in the first place.
L145[12:01:40]

<einBeo> no
success factor, it is not avoidable by going slower. What I think
is happening is that the robot moves near a meteor, not loading the
meteor yet, then at some point loading the meteor, which affects
not just the meteors chunk but also adjacent chunks, which the
robot is in
L146[12:02:16] <Corded> >
<Amanda> @Renno they're still probably charging less
than the compan…
L147[12:02:16]

<Renno>
that sounds like the company is losing by paying more than before
to both parties... ?
L148[12:02:32] <Amanda> Almost as if LLMs
are a net loss to society!
L149[12:02:41]

<Renno> you
keep moving the goal post
L150[12:03:10]

<Renno> are
you for the company making more profit or less?
L151[12:03:25]

<Renno>
I'm confused as to what your position is other than fill in
the blank to be anti LLM
L152[12:03:58] <Amanda> LLMs are a waste
of water, electricity, and human time. That's my
position.
L153[12:05:09]

<Renno>
that's a fair opinion but making up claims and statements that
are inconsistent simply for the sake of making claims and
statements and changing them to fit that end is concerning
L154[12:06:26] <Amanda> So now my posiiton
is a "claim" not a position I'm holding? Got
is.
L155[12:06:30] <Amanda> Got it*
L156[12:06:47]

<Renno> no,
you have your position, you made claims prior that are
inconsistent
L157[12:07:48]

<Renno>
> LLMs are a method of taking the skilled and using it for
wealth, while denying wealth to the skilled.
L158[12:07:48]

<Renno>
then you say that the people with skill are literally charging
double what they would normally prior to LLMs to do work literally
caused by LLMs
L159[12:09:27] <Amanda> That doens't
make LLMs good. It means human time is being wasted cleaning up the
output of the plagerism machine.
L160[12:10:10] <Amanda> Because some share
holder thought a bubblewand was a replacemtn for skilled
work.
L161[12:15:11]

<Forecaster> The statement that
they're using the prior work of skilled people through LLMs to
make money and the statement that other people make money off of
correcting mistakes made by LLMs can both be true at the same time
can't they?
L162[12:19:00] <Corded> >
<RedstoneParkour> would perhaps pregenerating the chunk by
having a chunkload…
L163[12:19:00]

<einBeo> I
underestimated the world size when pregenerating such massive
regions of the world. This drone approach might actually be one I
end up using
L164[12:19:11] <Corded> >
<einBeo> * massive regions of the world as I was
planning.
L165[12:23:33] <Corded> >
<Forecaster> The statement that they're using the prior
work of skilled …
L166[12:23:33]

<Renno>
sure can be, but the framing of that statement was specifically
that it results in less money for the skilled which was immediately
contradicted. the only thing that changed aside from apparently
double the money was the way in which they used skills to make that
money
L167[12:28:21]

<Forecaster> It's a fact that the
people who's work the LLMs have absorbed don't receive
one penny in compensation
L168[12:29:25]

<Forecaster> the fact that some people are
making money correcting LLM mistakes is a separate thing
L169[12:30:09] <Corded> >
<Forecaster> It's a fact that the people who's
work the LLMs have absorb…
L170[12:30:09]

<Renno>
iirc that is actually untrue as of this year, though it was a
shitty deal, I recall something about Anthropic specifically losing
a lawsuit and having to pay up.
L171[12:30:27] <Amanda> ... to book
publishers.
L172[12:30:38] <Amanda> and only becuase
they used torrented books
L173[12:30:47] <Amanda> so now
they're destroying books to feed into the machine
instead
L174[12:31:30]

<Renno>
they finished doing that some time ago
L175[12:31:43] <RedstoneParkour> the
scrapers persist t
L176[12:31:51] <RedstoneParkour>
though*
L177[12:33:06] <Amanda> The judge
specifically refused to rule wether the ingestion was infringement
on it's own, they just ruled that you can't use
torrented/"stolen" media for it
L178[12:40:13] <RedstoneParkour> anyways
i'd say the whole llm thing is bad because it takes a lot from
the commons yet gives
L179[12:40:20] <RedstoneParkour> not much
back
L180[12:45:07]

<Renno>
would you say that Adobe's business model being reverse
engineered and open sourced for all to use as giving back?
L181[12:45:23] <Amanda> I don't see
that project lasting
L182[12:45:33]

<Renno>
does that answer the question?
L183[12:46:57]

<Renno> an
alternative but similar question is that of the gaming innovations
that have happened lately. Many many old and unsupported games have
been revived and all kinds of new gaming mashups and possibilites
are now available to the average person. many games and even whole
consoles have been reverse engineered and given back to people
for
L184[12:46:58] <Corded> free
L185[12:48:09]

<Forecaster> if that's worth people
suffering for you that's fine I guess, I'm sure the
people forced to live next to data centers really appreciate all
these games they can play now
L186[12:48:20] <Amanda>
"free"
L187[12:49:07]

<Renno> and
speaking for myself personally, I have benefitted greatly in time
savings. I no longer have to sit here and do many hours, days,
weeks, or months of agonizing manual testing and instead can just
point an LLM at it and have it test it up to my standards so that
it gets like 90 to 99% of the stuff handled in like a day with
almost 0
L188[12:49:07] <Corded> agony on my
part
L189[12:49:34]

<Forecaster> that's very selfish of
you
L190[12:49:43]

<Renno>
selfish? 😂
L191[12:49:47] <Amanda> Some of us
actually like to code.
L192[12:50:26]

<Forecaster> what you just said I read as
"I don't care about the suffering and other stuff,
it's convenient for me"
L193[12:50:46]

<Renno>
well that would be a misreading
L194[12:51:03] <Corded> >
<Amanda> Some of us actually like to code.
L195[12:51:03]

<Renno> I
like the engineering and the systems design, I personally
don't care much about manually typing everything. I like
results
L196[12:51:05]

<unitazer>
farmer complaining that a combine does his job better (1826)
L197[12:51:13]

<Renno>
when I want type, I practice on speedtypingonline.com
L198[12:52:59] <Corded> >
<Forecaster> if that's worth people suffering for you
that's fine I gues…
L199[12:53:00]

<Renno> I
happen to live next to one
L200[12:53:10]

<Renno>
it's here regardless of whether I want it or not
L201[12:53:18]

<Renno> so
I might as well get my use out of it
L204[12:58:16]

<Forecaster> I'm not talking about
you specifically, but whatever
L205[12:58:18]

<Forecaster> 🙂
L206[12:59:09]

<Forecaster> a certain statement I made
earlier comes back to mind...
L207[12:59:42]

<Renno>
I'm not sure how you mean you're not talking about me
specifically when you said I was selfish?
L208[13:41:24] ⇦
Quits: Amanda (~m-yt727s@cloud.camnet.site) (Remote host closed the
connection)
L209[13:42:34] *** Joins: Amanda
(~m-yt727s@cloud.camnet.site) AmandaC
L210[14:09:12] *** Joins: Vexatos
(~Vexatos@2001:4647:af75:0:c545:7d7c:25ec:ace4) Vexatos
L211[14:09:12]
zsh sets mode: +v on Vexatos
L212[15:20:24] ⇦
Quits: JajaSteele70221947312603
(~jajasteel@lfbn-dij-1-711-129.w90-100.abo.wanadoo.fr) (Remote host
closed the connection)
L213[15:33:06]
⇨ Joins: JajaSteele70221947312603
(~jajasteel@lfbn-dij-1-711-129.w90-100.abo.wanadoo.fr)
L214[16:20:52] ⇦
Quits: ping (~uwu@femboy.me) (Quit: 🥕🐡)
L215[16:21:02]
⇨ Joins: ping (~uwu@femboy.me)
L216[17:20:42]

<SpiderEveryOS> %tonkout
L217[17:20:43] <MichiBot> Blast!
SpiderEveryOS! You beat your own previous record of 9h 9m 39s (By
3h 14m 25s)! I hope you're happy!
L218[17:20:43] <MichiBot> SpiderEveryOS
has tonked out! Tonk has been reset! They gained 0.012 tonk points!
plus 0.022 bonus points for consecutive hours! Current score:
3.50767703, Position #1
L219[21:57:51] ⇦
Quits: Vexatos (~Vexatos@2001:4647:af75:0:c545:7d7c:25ec:ace4)
(Quit: Insert quantum chemistry joke here)
L220[22:26:17] ⇦
Quits: RedstoneParkour (~RedstoneP@109.36.230.114) (Ping timeout:
194 seconds)
L221[22:29:21] *** Joins: RedstoneParkour
(~RedstoneP@109.36.225.106) RedstoneParkour
L222[22:50:49] <TransGal48722> aww I
missed the slop discussion
L223[22:57:48] ⇦
Quits: RedstoneParkour (~RedstoneP@109.36.225.106) (Ping timeout:
201 seconds)
L224[23:00:50] *** Joins: RedstoneParkour
(~RedstoneP@109.36.225.250) RedstoneParkour
L225[23:12:05]

<SpiderEveryOS> %tonk
L226[23:12:05] <MichiBot> Fiddlesticks!
SpiderEveryOS! You beat your own previous record of 0s (By 5h 51m
22s)! I hope you're happy!
L227[23:12:06] <MichiBot>
SpiderEveryOS's new record is 5h 51m 22s! No points gained for
stealing from yourself. (Lost out on 0.00586)