<<Prev Next>> Scroll to Bottom
Stuff goes here
L1[00:10:54]
<liach>
no, put it in routing motor @texaswriter
L2[00:28:20]
<texaswriter> i see.
L3[00:28:37]
<texaswriter> i'm not having any
luck with it routing carts
L4[00:28:48]
<texaswriter> what track does the
routing motor interact with?
L6[00:47:38]
<bball.psd> switches and wyes
L7[00:47:47] ⇦
Quits: Hawk777
(Hawk777!~chead@2607:c000:81d9:f400:8464:5fc4:331b:7779) (Quit:
Leaving.)
L8[00:50:21]
<texaswriter> thanks guys . I had the
routing motor on the wrong side.
L9[01:24:06] ⇨
Joins: mattym (mattym!mattym@2604:180:2:da::7)
L11[03:37:47]
<liach>
Strongly agree. If you are in the technic discord and did not mute
everyone pings you should be informed, too
L12[09:09:13]
<Trinsdar> on a scale of 1-10, how
buggy would you say railcraft 1.12 is right now?
L13[09:36:37]
<liach>
4
L14[09:37:08]
<liach>
for i'm lazy fixing it, working on sth else
L15[09:47:55]
<Trinsdar> So 4 means very buggy or
not very buggy?
L16[09:50:59]
<liach>
1 least 10 most
L17[09:51:13]
<liach>
some bugs are caused by the merging
L18[09:51:37]
<liach>
some refactors are underway, but most core logics should be
fine
L19[09:53:47]
<liach>
honestly i am not a big fan of the current release system, too.
Even patrons cannot get non-manual builds
L20[09:54:05]
<liach>
and even a tiny compile fix need to wait till cj's free
L21[12:44:14] ⇨
Joins: Vexatos
(Vexatos!~Vexatos@p200300C107205E250858AD268D8F1D73.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
L22[13:28:06] ⇨
Joins: SatanicSanta
(SatanicSanta!~SatanicSa@c-24-22-63-87.hsd1.or.comcast.net)
L23[14:27:45] ⇨
Joins: ImQ009
(ImQ009!~ImQ009@89-64-45-113.dynamic.chello.pl)
L24[15:02:43] ⇦
Quits: ImQ009 (ImQ009!~ImQ009@89-64-45-113.dynamic.chello.pl)
(Quit: Leaving)
L25[15:45:10]
<CovertJaguar> do you have to be so
negative all the time? ugh
L26[15:46:51]
<CovertJaguar> there was _one_ bug
from the merging, it was fixed weeks ago. The other bugs in the
multiblocks were from code _you_ added, namely returning zero size
inventories for invalid structures
L27[15:47:53]
<CovertJaguar> right now, I'd say
we are closer to 6-8 in terms of readiness
L28[15:48:03]
<CovertJaguar> I've been
contemplating moving out of alpha
L29[15:48:36]
<CovertJaguar> I need to look at the
recipe stuff still, but other than that the API is mostly
finalized
L30[15:49:37]
<CovertJaguar> charge and inventory
stuff needs testing, but I'm fairly confident in it atm
L31[15:50:17]
<CovertJaguar> I need to push that
final 1.10 build to release, I keep forgetting about it
L32[15:53:42]
<CovertJaguar> and no I don't see
how routing is a PITA to use, its no more complicated than any
other alternative and probably 10x more reliable than any graph
building path finding algorithm that the other solutions
require
L33[15:55:28]
<CovertJaguar> your destination string
is like a mailing address, for example you have
country->state->county->city->street->address
L34[15:57:00]
<CovertJaguar> then in your routing
tables, if you need to divert at a switch to reach that address,
you just put for example the "country->state" bit in
the routing table to indicate that all traffic headed to that state
needs to turn here
L35[15:57:13]
<CovertJaguar> @texaswriter ^
L36[15:58:50]
<CovertJaguar> and that's it, all
that is required is an intelligent address system and a quick setup
when building your switches
L37[15:59:41]
<CovertJaguar> your address system can
be as simple or as complex as you require
L38[16:06:47] ⇦
Quits: Nirek (Nirek!~Nirek@ip68-11-40-69.no.no.cox.net) (Ping
timeout: 180 seconds)
L39[16:09:36]
<CovertJaguar> with the current
system, if a train gets lost, it was because of user error, not
system faults. any other design would undoubtable result in
occasional system faults and lost trains, and lets not talk about
the computational cost of scanning an entire railsystem
L40[16:11:47]
<CovertJaguar> I've seen
factorio's trains drive in endless circles for example
L41[16:13:02]
<vedrit> Factorio is amazing.
L42[16:13:03]
<vedrit> That aside, please do let the
~~mindless masses~~ public get RC, please :D
L43[16:14:46]
<CovertJaguar> soon, I want it out
too, it just not quite ready
L44[16:15:23]
<liach>
cj, let me work on my data pack thing first
L45[16:16:18]
<CovertJaguar> first I've heard
of that. what's your goal in regards to railcraft?
L46[16:22:36]
<liach>
bug fixes? i am mainly interested in tracks and carts
L47[16:22:57]
<liach>
there's a very interesting cart blanche mod that adds a lot of
carts
L48[16:59:32] ⇦
Quits: SatanicSanta
(SatanicSanta!~SatanicSa@c-24-22-63-87.hsd1.or.comcast.net) (Quit:
KVIrc 4.3.1 Aria http://www.kvirc.net/)
L49[17:10:34]
<CovertJaguar> what does that have to
do with datapacks?
L50[17:34:15]
<liach>
uh, not much
L51[17:34:36]
<liach>
the thing is i've never really published a mod before that is
totally authored by me
L52[17:54:06] ⇦
Quits: Vexatos
(Vexatos!~Vexatos@p200300C107205E250858AD268D8F1D73.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
(Quit: Insert quantum chemistry joke here)
L53[18:52:10]
<ThatGuy> Do you think it will be out
before February?
L54[19:06:49]
<liach>
asking when it will be out is generally ineffective
L55[19:12:05]
<vedrit> Do you think it will be
out?
L56[19:12:12]
<vedrit> :p
L57[19:12:41]
<liach>
ask cj. it's not really my business to release railcraft
L58[22:31:39]
<CovertJaguar> I'd say there is a
really good chance it is out before Feburary
L59[22:31:49]
<CovertJaguar> I'd say there is a
really good chance it is out before February [Edited]
L60[22:38:42] ⇨
Joins: travis-ci
(travis-ci!~travis-ci@ec2-54-225-37-46.compute-1.amazonaws.com)
L61[22:38:42] ⇦
Parts: travis-ci
(travis-ci!~travis-ci@ec2-54-225-37-46.compute-1.amazonaws.com)
())
L64[22:38:42] <travis-ci>
Railcraft/Railcraft#111 (mc-1.12.2 - c5baf0d : CovertJaguar): The
build is still failing.
L65[22:46:32]
<liach>
Largely good chance. I agree.