<<Prev Next>> Scroll to Bottom
Stuff goes here
L1[00:33:22] <Amanda> %choose zzzmews?
L2[00:33:22] <MichiBot> Ama​nda: Amanda's hair turns black
L3[00:33:37] <Amanda> my fur was already black! Am a void kitn!
L4[00:41:11] <Corded> > <SoraFi​restorm> I don't want to use vibecode on principle, but legitimately…
L5[00:41:11] <Re​nno> The single best thing that you can do or that any of us can do as individual programmers is to actually kind of help and contribute and oversee what they're doing
L6[00:42:01] <Corded> > <Re​nno> reacted 👆 to <Kristo​bear38> @SoraFirestorm if only everyone who started their own port worked on an existin…
L7[00:42:47] <SoraFi​restorm> You say that like my philosophy on vibecode doesn't produce an oil and water situation
L8[00:43:29] <SoraFi​restorm> especially in a case like this because - again - I am largely a stranger to JVM land
L9[00:44:08] <Corded> > <SoraFi​restorm> You say that like my philosophy on vibecode doesn't produce…
L10[00:44:08] <Re​nno> One of the ultimate Achilles heels of programmers, especially the very technical niche ones like most open computers ones are, is that every single one of them wants to have their own creative way with everything in such a way that it makes it very difficult or even borderline impossible to actually mobilize any effort in a consolidated
L11[00:44:08] <Corded> form like a community edition
L12[00:45:32] <SoraFi​restorm> I really don't think conflict of creative direction is what's stopping ports
L13[00:45:32] <Corded> > <SoraFi​restorm> especially in a case like this because - again - I am large…
L14[00:45:32] <Re​nno> I personally kind of hate manually modding minecraft, it's not very intuitive for me, so I know what you mean
L15[00:47:04] <Re​nno> I think that's absolutely what's stopping it. I've seen at least half a dozen different ports. Everyone wants to go off on their own way and do it their own way. None of them want to work together, or at least none of them want to do things in the same way, and the few that do come together often have other real life issues that get in
L16[00:47:04] <Corded> the way so momentum dies off. So they all make their own independent ports of everything and basically never finish
L17[00:49:55] <Re​nno> So say what you will, feel how you will feel about the vibe coded version, but at least it's a version and it appears to be generally kind of working, which is more than I can say for most, if not all, prior attempts
L18[00:54:22] *** Joins: Hawk777 (~Hawk777@2605:1700:1080:de00:6b5e:19ea:b2ae:826d) Hawk777
L19[00:59:27] <Izzy> good thing 1.12 is still here huh
L20[01:00:09] <Hawk777> Michiyo, I am curious, the 1.21 OC you were showing off, does that allow pluggable architectures like the 1.12 one did?
L21[01:00:31] <Izzy> pretty much impossible to avoid the slop though. was really hoping the bottom would fall out of it before we got to this point but I guess people want to throw more money at devaluing skilled labour
L22[01:00:43] <Izzy> gotta make sure the wealthy have access to skills but the skilled have no access to wealth
L23[01:01:21] <Izzy> ah well, we'll all burn together
L24[01:01:37] <Corded> > <Re​nno> I think that's absolutely what's stopping it. I've seen at …
L25[01:01:37] <SoraFi​restorm> It's probably just because it's a bunch of people over time who have no idea about each other just diving in instead of surveying whatever efforts may or may not exist
L26[01:02:14] <SoraFi​restorm> The undertones that people are deliberately not working together are questionable
L27[01:04:03] <Corded> > <Re​nno> So say what you will, feel how you will feel about the vibe…
L28[01:04:03] <SoraFi​restorm> It's a version in legal limbo that realistically you shouldn't use as a base for further work, so is it really of any legitimate long-term value?
L29[01:04:31] <Izzy> that's an interesting point, it can't be licensed as it's gone through the license-washing machine
L30[01:04:55] <Amanda> I know several independent tech contractors. Most of them charge more to clean up slop code. And double again of you hide that it was slop
L31[01:05:54] <Amanda> The wealthy just think they've stolen the skills, their heads will be on pikes soon enough
L32[01:06:06] <Izzy> I envy your optimism.
L33[01:06:22] <Izzy> Something will change but I doubt it will be that cathartic.
L34[01:06:47] <Amanda> Yeah, they'll just move into the next money laundering scheme
L35[01:06:59] <Izzy> Wonder what GPU-themed scam will be next
L36[01:11:10] <Amanda> Izzy: I mean, also, they're also starting to get the bills for the ai "agents" they're trying to deploy trying over and over to produce valid json so the "tools" talk to excited each other. It literally turned out that the Claude thing was just feeding json parser errors back into the plagerism machine instead of the machine actually being able to use these "tools"
L37[01:12:28] <Amanda> Burning thought so many billed tokens just so the sloperators can ask about the weather
L38[01:13:55] <Amanda> Anyways, I've been up since 04-0500, time for Zzmwss
L39[01:14:11] <Izzy> sleeb well!
L40[01:14:26] * Amanda pawhugs Elfi close, meows about the dream she can just barely not remember
L41[01:14:32] <Amanda> Night girls
L42[01:35:21] <Corded> > <SoraFi​restorm> It's a version in legal limbo that realistically you should…
L43[01:35:21] <Re​nno> Legal limbo? Where's the lawsuit?
L44[01:36:32] <SoraFi​restorm> The copyright status of LLM-generated code is - to put it shortly and gently - not well defined
L45[01:36:58] <Re​nno> It does also appear that quite a large portion of the code is actually the original code, and that there were actually only specific edits made to the Scala code, which is still mostly preserved, in order to make it compatible with Neoforge and later newer Minecraft conventions.
L46[01:37:21] <SoraFi​restorm> You do not know where the LLM lifed code, therefore you do not know the copyright license attached to said code
L47[01:37:23] <Re​nno> And it does appear that this is precisely why there the persistence bug is still persistent, because the original code is still largely preserved.
L48[01:37:32] <SoraFi​restorm> * lifted
L49[01:37:47] <Corded> > <SoraFi​restorm> The copyright status of LLM-generated code is - to put it s…
L50[01:37:47] <Re​nno> so?
L51[01:37:55] <SoraFi​restorm> What do you mean 'so'?
L52[01:37:59] <Re​nno> Pragmatically that means basically nothing
L53[01:38:12] <SoraFi​restorm> LLM output must be defacto considered to be tainted and unusable
L54[01:38:22] <Re​nno> That's a pretty wild opinion
L55[01:38:38] <Izzy> it's either public domain, so you can't license it, or it's not yours to license
L56[01:39:03] <Re​nno> I haven't checked the license for open computers, but if I do recall, it's MIT licensed. And if I do recall, doesn't that typically mean that you just need to extend the MIT license to any continuation of that thing?
L57[01:41:11] <SoraFi​restorm> Well what if the code that the LLM lifts is GPL?
L58[01:41:25] <SoraFi​restorm> You can't license that under MIT, because GPL requires like-license
L59[01:41:47] <SoraFi​restorm> And in general, you can't know where LLM-generated code comes from, practically by design
L60[01:41:53] <SoraFi​restorm> the only safe thing to do is to not use it
L61[01:42:20] <Re​nno> So then have it write the code. You go in and you rewrite the code that it wrote so that it's functionally equivalent, but it's still written by you by the end of the day? I feel that most, if not all, of this is ultimately pointless. I don't really understand the kvetch or the the friction here. It's an open source Minecraft mod. I
L62[01:42:20] <Corded> think that to the scope of what we're talking about, that this legal status and all of this other things are really nonfactors
L63[01:42:41] <SoraFi​restorm> Didn't realize it was "wild" to care about where code comes from
L64[01:43:02] <Re​nno> Well, I think that in context, it is a wild opinion because we're not talking about the code to launch a rocket to the moon. We're talking about a Minecraft mod that is explicitly open source
L65[01:43:23] <Corded> > <Re​nno> So then have it write the code. You go in and you rewrite t…
L66[01:43:24] <SoraFi​restorm> Not likely to be sufficiently clean-room, especially if you want to be sure you don't have tainted code
L67[01:43:29] <Izzy> Could also be source-visible but not FOSS and then you're really in the shit.
L68[01:43:55] <SoraFi​restorm> Or something completely intended to be proprietary that somehow ended up in the training data anyways
L69[01:44:28] <SoraFi​restorm> just because an LLM regurgitated it back to you does not inherently absolve you of responsibility
L70[01:44:39] <SoraFi​restorm> +of following the license
L71[01:44:46] <SoraFi​restorm> the only winning move is not to play
L72[01:44:52] <Re​nno> That basically extends the crime of the company that stole the data, which in this case would be the AI companies, to the then customers. Is that what you're saying?
L73[01:45:22] <SoraFi​restorm> because it's essentially complicit, yeah basically
L74[01:45:49] <Re​nno> I highly disagree
L75[01:46:32] <Re​nno> If you were to put tires on your car from this new company that come to find out years later, they effectively did some industrial espionage and stole the process from another tire company on how to make tires better or how to make their own specific kind of tires for themselves and then sell it as a business, are you then compliant or
L76[01:46:32] <Corded> in some way complicit in their crime or simply being a consumer of their product, even though you did not necessarily know that that was the case ahead of time? I think not
L77[01:47:52] <SoraFi​restorm> I don't feel like that's the same situation but fine, you have a point
L78[01:47:56] <Re​nno> I think that that is ultimately a preposterous precedent to even assume because that is such an onset of implications on such a scale that is simply not only ridiculous but frankly unenforceable. The same applies to this
L79[01:48:23] <Izzy> Say you got a disk from a guy, right. It has source code on it. You think it's neat. You don't question where it comes from, but you sell the resulting program.
L80[01:49:10] <Re​nno> Well, in that scenario, Izzy, the you in question would not be you or me individuals. The you in that scenario is literally Anthropic or OpenAI or any of these other AI companies
L81[01:49:35] <Izzy> Yes. The guy is your LLM provider, and you're trafficking in stolen goods.
L82[01:49:39] <Re​nno> Because you do have to remember here that the code generated is not a one-for-one example. It is rarely ever exactly the same. And in many cases, it's meaningfully and materially different in implementation from the actual source code that it was trained on.
L83[01:49:53] <SoraFi​restorm> Prove it
L84[01:50:17] <Re​nno> yea?
L85[01:50:36] <Re​nno> so the onus proof is on who here exactly?
L86[01:51:26] <Re​nno> I'm pretty sure that when I have, for example, what I just did earlier, when I have Deep Seek V4 Flash write its own extension for itself to add to its own system prompt, that that code was never used anywhere before, that it was never once created anywhere prior. I know that for a fact. because it literally doesn't exist except for that
L87[01:51:26] <Corded> purpose
L88[01:52:17] <SoraFi​restorm> LLMs don't synthesize like that
L89[01:52:19] <Re​nno> These algorithms are literally seeded RNG machines. Some parts of their code, maybe individual lines, could potentially be repetitions of exact lines in the training data. But to act as though a custom-made piece of code generated by an AI is exactly the same as the source training data is insane.
L90[01:52:44] <Corded> > <SoraFi​restorm> LLMs don't synthesize like that
L91[01:52:44] <Re​nno> Synthesize like what?
L92[01:53:02] <SoraFi​restorm> LLMs don't make new data from scratch
L93[01:53:12] <Re​nno> Except they do.
L94[01:53:15] <Re​nno> like actually
L95[01:53:16] <Re​nno> they do
L96[01:53:27] <SoraFi​restorm> like actually they don't
L97[01:53:29] <Re​nno> It's literally generative
L98[01:54:16] <Re​nno> If they weren't generative and then that would mean that they're deterministic in the way that you're describing, that means that all code that they write has already been written once before and therefore that means that once before, based on my example, someone somewhere had written the code for that extension before the model had even
L99[01:54:17] <Corded> existed, before the harness had even existed.
L100[01:54:27] <SoraFi​restorm> they can only (re)combine data already in the training set
L101[01:54:38] <Re​nno> Correct. That's literally the definition of creating new data
L102[01:54:55] <Re​nno> Every word, every sentence, every thought you have is a recombination of the same base primitives of the alphabet and numerical characters
L103[01:55:03] <SoraFi​restorm> Not in the copyright 'derivative works' sense it's not
L104[01:56:07] <SoraFi​restorm> If an LLM is 'trained on' code that already exists, and (re)combines that code together to make new code
L105[01:56:16] <SoraFi​restorm> That is the textbook definition of derivative work
L106[01:56:48] <Re​nno> You do not need permission if the original work is old enough to be in the public domain
L107[01:57:01] <Izzy> Good thing they're only training on public domain works, then! Wait.
L108[01:57:13] <SoraFi​restorm> You are assuming that they are only training on PD material
L109[01:57:17] <Re​nno> No, they aren't. That much is now obvious. However, to act as if it is simply one or the other is not true
L110[01:57:50] <Re​nno> However, the public domain is very, very, very large and undoubtedly quite a large quantity of their training data is public domain.
L111[01:58:07] <SoraFi​restorm> But that doesn't matter if any of their training data isn't
L112[01:58:36] <SoraFi​restorm> The pool has copyright material in it, so for certain uses, it is poison
L113[01:58:53] <SoraFi​restorm> * copyrighted
L114[01:59:09] <SoraFi​restorm> because you can't even do a simple thing like ask 'where did this code come from?'
L115[01:59:25] <Re​nno> they also can't prove that you used AI, either
L116[01:59:26] <SoraFi​restorm> it is LITERALLY IMPOSSIBLE to do your due diligence with LLM-generated anything!
L117[01:59:36] <SoraFi​restorm> * *anything!*
L118[01:59:53] <SoraFi​restorm> and THAT is the problem!
L119[02:00:49] <Re​nno> I don't really understand how this informs your position whatsoever, especially considering the fact that it's not explicitly illegal. And not only that, it's literally impossible to enforce because you can't prove what is and is not written by AI. And that even if you could, there is so much code that you would have to do an audit to
L120[02:00:49] <Corded> such an extent that it would take you a thousand years. So what exactly is the point of this? Poison (as you say) or not, effectively it doesn't matter.
L121[02:01:57] <SoraFi​restorm> Using a previous example, using GPL code in an MIT project and continuing to license the entire thing as MIT is literally copyright infringement aka illegal
L122[02:02:21] <Re​nno> So, rewrite the code. Copy it, but don't copy it. Copy the functionality, but do your own implementation
L123[02:03:42] <Corded> > <SoraFi​restorm> Not likely to be sufficiently clean-room, especially if you…
L124[02:03:42] <SoraFi​restorm> That's probably not good enough for clean room law, though I don't know for sure because IANAL
L125[02:03:47] <SoraFi​restorm> I wouldn't be willing to take that chance
L126[02:04:33] <Re​nno> To some extent, it is a little refreshing to see so many people with such reverence for the law. But, you know, at this rate, in this specific context related to the open computers court, you're basically arguing to self-litigate yourself out of having open computers. At what point are you just someone trying to play minecraft?
L127[02:04:49] <Corded> > <SoraFi​restorm> I wouldn't be willing to take that chance
L128[02:04:49] <Re​nno> Chance of what? You think someone will SUE YOU for porting OC?
L129[02:06:22] <SoraFi​restorm> https://paste.pc-logix.com/lavutuzigi
L130[02:06:54] <Re​nno> I find that to be ridiculous, but you do you ig
L131[02:16:21] <�​�> wow...
L132[02:16:21] <�​�> i ltierally just joined and I'm already reading something batsht retarded
L133[02:17:11] <�​�> * literally
L134[02:19:04] <�​�> Copy coding has been around for decades before AI..
L135[02:19:05] <�​�> Even google forks and deploys opensource projects as subdomains
L136[02:19:30] <�​�> code wiki google is deepwiki
L137[02:19:40] <�​�> https://klipy.com/gifs/reaction-cat-36
L138[02:20:11] <unit​azer> useless argument anyways because clanker companies will bribe politicians to make it legal anyways
L139[02:20:18] <unit​azer> theyve already done that iirc
L140[02:20:47] <Izzy> important to remember that the law will nonetheless be deployed against those that aren't in the in-group
L141[02:21:15] <Izzy> what's the phrase, group that the law binds but does not protect, and group that the law protects but does not bind
L142[02:21:24] <unit​azer> whatever comes out of an llm is owned by whoever owns the llm, but clod and other clankers write it into their tos that whatever slop you get is yours or something close to that
L143[02:21:41] <unit​azer> so you can go cry about it if you dont like being in the training data for them
L144[02:21:46] <unit​azer> either that on dont use the internet
L145[02:24:12] <�​�> Even with MIT license?
L146[03:15:42] <Corded> > <Haw​k777> Michiyo, I am curious, the 1.21 OC you were showing off, do…
L147[03:15:43] <Mic​hiyo> It should yes. It's 1.12 with enough changes to get it running in 1.21 the OC logic is largely unchanged, it's the MC side that's vastly different
L148[03:48:07] <Hawk777> Nice! Perhaps when it’s more stable I will look into that.
L149[03:59:05] <Spider​EveryOS> %tonkout
L150[03:59:06] <MichiBot> Gadsbudlikins! Spider​EveryOS! You beat Forec​aster's previous record of 3 hours, 21 minutes and 50 seconds (By 3 hours, 56 minutes and 57 seconds)! I hope you're happy!
L151[03:59:07] <MichiBot> Spider​EveryOS has stolen the tonkout! Tonk has been reset! They gained 0.007 tonk points! plus 0.006 bonus points for consecutive hours! (Reduced to 50% because stealing) Current score: 2.5350006. Position #1
L152[04:00:02] <Mic​hiyo> I'm considering rolling OpenPrinters into OC... but shrug
L153[04:00:42] <SoraFi​restorm> Honestly I probably would in your shoes
L154[04:01:21] <SoraFi​restorm> ComputerCraft has a useless printer, OpenComputers should too :P
L155[04:01:35] <Mic​hiyo> I'm currently ripping out as MUCH as the original port as I can... so many WTFs
L156[04:02:38] <SoraFi​restorm> Gotta love LLM spaghetti lol
L157[04:02:44] <Mic​hiyo> Oh 100%
L158[04:03:34] <SoraFi​restorm> Are you planning on keeping the T4 items introduced here or nah?
L159[04:04:56] <Mic​hiyo> IDK.... They're kinda neat but I'm not sure if they feel like the spirit of the original.
L160[04:05:27] <Mic​hiyo> I know Vex did the t3.5 RAM in Computronics, but again it was an addon sooo
L161[04:06:28] <SoraFi​restorm> What about the new screens (the flat ones and the holographic ones)?
L162[04:07:02] <Mic​hiyo> BTW https://discordembeds.pc-logix.com/live/1533325225867870288/1785643621829-c9da5a59f94c.png
L163[04:08:16] <Mic​hiyo> I like the holographic screens... Honestly OpenScreens was one of the addons I ALWAYS installed when I was playing OC
L164[04:11:34] <SoraFi​restorm> haha cool love it
L165[04:12:23] <Corded> > <Mic​hiyo> I like the holographic screens... Honestly OpenScreens was …
L166[04:12:24] <SoraFi​restorm> I looked it up just now and... yeah, these are those
L167[04:13:13] <Mic​hiyo> Yep they're licensed MIT, I'm going to open an issue, see if the original dev cares if they're rolled into the 1.21.1 port, or if they want to update the mod themselves.
L168[04:15:14] <SoraFi​restorm> didn't occur to me that it was already a mod
L169[04:17:43] <Mic​hiyo> https://discordembeds.pc-logix.com/live/1533327916811944036/1785644263381-713d9e5a1564.png
L170[04:18:17] <Mic​hiyo> So yeah I'll keep them, they're neat to have, and worst case, folks just don't use it.
L171[04:19:04] <Spider​EveryOS> Me and some other people tried bringing oc to newer minecraft before but didn't have time since we got other projects
L172[04:19:19] <Mic​hiyo> Well, 1.21.1 seems to be working pretty well so far
L173[04:19:52] <Forec​aster> I love how in this long discussion about LLMs nobody brought up any of the various other reasons to not like them
L174[04:20:11] <Forec​aster> It's not like "where the code comes from" is the only issue
L175[04:20:41] <SoraFi​restorm> I was trying so hard not to argue about GenAI that I tried to end it as gracefully as possible as quickly as possible
L176[04:20:57] <SoraFi​restorm> There are definitely other reasons to not like them, I just kept them to myself
L177[04:25:38] <Forec​aster> The other day I was offered a DLL as a fix for something. It had been tainted by LLM.
L178[04:25:38] <Forec​aster> When I said I wouldn't touch it because of that I got a couple of paragraphs of rant about how "DirectX 11 is complicated"
L179[04:25:38] <Forec​aster> I just didn't respond
L180[05:04:32] <Forec​aster> %tonk
L181[05:04:33] <MichiBot> Yikes! Forec​aster! You beat Spider​EveryOS's previous record of <0 (By 1 hour, 5 minutes and 26 seconds)! I hope you're happy!
L182[05:04:34] <MichiBot> Forecaster's new record is 1 hour, 5 minutes and 26 seconds! Forecaster also gained 0.00109 tonk points for stealing the tonk. Position #2. Need 0.2222812 more points to pass Spider​EveryOS!
L183[05:50:32] <Mic​hiyo> I'm really not a fan of Scala... lol
L184[05:52:37] <Hawk777> Probably a huge amount of work to port it to a different language though…
L185[05:54:38] <Mic​hiyo> Yeah
L186[05:57:13] <Forec​aster> Noo I'm sure you'll have it done in an afternoon
L187[05:57:25] <Forec​aster> ( +- a year )
L188[06:48:45] <Forec​aster> %tonkout
L189[06:48:47] <MichiBot> Dogast! Forec​aster! You beat your own previous record of 1 hour, 5 minutes and 26 seconds (By 38 minutes and 47 seconds)! I hope you're happy!
L190[06:48:48] <MichiBot> Forec​aster has tonked out! Tonk has been reset! They gained 0.001 tonk points! Current score: 2.3137194, Position #2 Need 0.2212812 more points to pass Spider​EveryOS!
L191[06:59:53] *** Joins: Vexatos (~Vexatos@2001:4647:af75:0:bb33:d464:9e18:52bb) Vexatos
L192[06:59:53] zsh sets mode: +v on Vexatos
L193[07:01:56] <Corded> > <Re​nno> I think that's absolutely what's stopping it. I've seen at …
L194[07:01:57] <as​ie> Yes, and I think vibe coding is part of why that is the case. If the cost of producing code is lower than the cost of socializing, it is more "efficient" for people to go their own way with their own forks that serve their personalized needs, than to collaborate with others to build something that benefits more people. I don't think it's
L195[07:01:57] <Corded> an issue exclusive to vibe coding, but it, as an LLM would say, "changes the calculus".
L196[07:02:48] <Corded> > <Mic​hiyo> BTW
L197[07:02:49] <Re​nno> dude, that looks cool. imagine if you could place a tablet on a surface
L198[07:02:59] <as​ie> There's a good reason, IMO, why two of the three OC update attempts I'm aware of appeared after Claude and Codex became mainstream
L199[07:03:45] <as​ie> Part of that is the fact nobody from the official development team was left to steward efforts, yes, but the first attempt did reach out to us for advice, and I helped however much I could. The other two efforts were discovered only because I happened to run into them in places which were not official spaces for the project
L200[07:03:53] <as​ie> Well, I brought up one here, and then the other revealed itself.
L201[07:03:59] <as​ie> If I recall correctly.
L202[07:04:17] <as​ie> The first attempt was also written in pre-Claude/Codex days. I'm talking about the 1.16.5 port that languished in our pull requests.
L203[07:04:36] <SoraFi​restorm> I still suspect it's not enough people coordinating at the same time, blissfully unaware of the existence of others
L204[07:04:37] <as​ie> The second is OC:CE, and there was also a third one but I'm not sure if it released any code. Those were done with heavy utilization of LLM technology
L205[07:04:50] <as​ie> as far as I'm aware
L206[07:05:10] <SoraFi​restorm> The third one: are you talking about the one by NorthwesternDevelopment?
L207[07:05:18] <as​ie> Maybe. I don't remember. I don't pay much attention to OC these days
L208[07:05:20] <Corded> > <as​ie> Yes, and I think vibe coding is part of why that is the cas…
L209[07:05:21] <Re​nno> yea I mean post AI coming into the scene I could see that for sure. there were attempts before that and even some afterwards that still refused to utilize AI
L210[07:05:49] <as​ie> As for the copyright issue. I think people need to stop acting like that argument even works these days. The US seems to be zeroing in on "training is fair use so long as the copyrighted material was acquired lawfully", which led us to a world where Anthropic is destroying books instead of pirating books, because that's Judge Approved and
L211[07:05:49] <Corded> the other way isn't
L212[07:06:11] <SoraFi​restorm> I'm just half-heartedly trying to figure out if the ones you're aware of are the ones I'm aware of
L213[07:06:31] <as​ie> We'll see where the EU goes - probably next year. Other countries I'm not paying as much attention to, but for example Ukraine is already working on laws which treat LLM output under sui generis/database-style copyright regimes
L214[07:06:55] <SoraFi​restorm> It might be fair game to ingest, but it's not fair game to just regurgitate stripped of its original source
L215[07:06:56] <as​ie> The US and EU, instead, appear to be zeroing in on "LLM output is, by itself, not a matter of copyright at all". There may be new laws passed in the next few years, but I don't expect them to outlaw LLMs.
L216[07:07:26] <as​ie> The Polish law scholar whose work on copyright law I follow is also of the opinion that this all is here to stay, and I'll trust an educated lawyer on this one
L217[07:07:29] <as​ie> * one, as I'm not one myself
L218[07:07:45] <Corded> > <as​ie> The Polish law scholar whose work on copyright law I follow…
L219[07:07:45] <Re​nno> I don't think they could get rid of it if they tried tbh
L220[07:07:52] <Re​nno> but yea it is definitely here to stay
L221[07:07:56] <Corded> > <Re​nno> I don't think they could get rid of it if they tried tbh
L222[07:07:56] <as​ie> Napster was a venture capital funded company which revolutionized music access
L223[07:07:59] <as​ie> And yet, music piracy remains illegal, 25 years on
L224[07:08:02] <as​ie> So, you can't know for sure
L225[07:08:15] <as​ie> +what will happen
L226[07:08:17] <Re​nno> making it illegal and getting rid of it are two different things
L227[07:08:22] <SoraFi​restorm> Like... the end result of where we are going is that it's fair game to copyright launder material through an LLM
L228[07:08:37] <as​ie> From the perspective of FOSS development, most projects which care about licensing also care about legality
L229[07:08:44] <SoraFi​restorm> I don't exactly have love of Intellectual Property as a concept but like
L230[07:08:48] <as​ie> So, in the context of a project like OpenComputers, making it illegal == getting rid of it
L231[07:08:49] <Re​nno> I'm talking about at large, in society
L232[07:08:54] <Re​nno> they can make it 'illegal', all they want
L233[07:09:04] <Re​nno> but short of enforcing it, good luck
L234[07:09:15] <as​ie> Either way.
L235[07:09:31] <Corded> > <SoraFi​restorm> I don't exactly have love of Intellectual Property as a con…
L236[07:09:31] <as​ie> What upsets me, and might upset you, is the unfairness of it all
L237[07:09:39] <Forec​aster> it's going to be a question about cost in the end I think
L238[07:09:54] <as​ie> I can get in considerable legal trouble for pirating a movie. Yet all of these companies are making billions by pirating movies. And books. And websites. And songs.
L239[07:10:03] <as​ie> +Like, three movies, for personal use.
L240[07:10:22] <as​ie> It's not a new issue - YouTube and Crunchyroll also became massive companies on the back of piracy - but it is particularly egregious this time around.
L241[07:10:29] <SoraFi​restorm> Like I said, I'm not a fan of Intellectual Property as a conceptual thing
L242[07:10:46] <SoraFi​restorm> and yes, that includes the horrifically lopsided way the law gets applied and when it doesn't
L243[07:10:50] <as​ie> So why aren't you supportive of LLMs from a legal angle no less? They are the one thing most likely to demolish "intellectual property" as we understand it today
L244[07:10:53] <SoraFi​restorm> * ways
L245[07:11:06] <as​ie> Plenty of moral, social, ethical arguments against LLMs - but I don't think I can square the legal arguments with an anti-IP mindset
L246[07:11:18] <as​ie> LLMs are, in fact, the ultimate realization of the "information wants to be free" slogan from the infoanarchist circles
L247[07:11:21] <SoraFi​restorm> oh, I think it's bad on those other vectors too
L248[07:12:10] <SoraFi​restorm> The angle about it being probably illegal is mostly about why using LLM code is a bad idea
L249[07:12:35] <as​ie> The problem is that actual lawsuits in many of the countries I track are going towards the "probably legal" direction. It was a valid argument in 2024, but by 2027-2028 it might not be one. Unless the laws change
L250[07:13:00] <SoraFi​restorm> It's definitely been harmful to society in a number of ways
L251[07:13:03] <SoraFi​restorm> I also like
L252[07:13:18] <as​ie> So I recommend focusing on the moral arguments you hold. Those are more subjective, but they are also generally more... real?
L253[07:13:32] <SoraFi​restorm> The thing I don't like is that I don't like how we as a society are training and using the models
L254[07:13:36] <SoraFi​restorm> as opposed to the technology itself
L255[07:13:44] <as​ie> I mean, yeah, hating a mathematical matrix is a preposterous idea
L256[07:14:00] <as​ie> I dislike LLMs on a number of axes. The fact they work at all feels, in a way, insulting
L257[07:14:01] <SoraFi​restorm> You're smart enough to know there's a difference
L258[07:14:39] <SoraFi​restorm> A lot of people seem to not understand the distinction there
L259[07:15:27] <SoraFi​restorm> And it's mostly frustration for me that it's like
L260[07:15:28] <as​ie> Because social media is overran by what I cheekily call "vibe ethics". People are flooded with so many social causes that they don't really have time for nuance, plus the nuance is honestly irrelevant
L261[07:15:45] <as​ie> It's like arguing cryptocurrency is actually good because there's a few fun research projects buried in the sea of grifting and conmannery and inefficiency and weird speculation
L262[07:15:53] <as​ie> Like, sure, they exist, but at the grand scale *it doesn't really matter8
L263[07:15:55] <as​ie> * matter*
L264[07:16:03] <SoraFi​restorm> LLMs could be fine and I could not care about them or whatever
L265[07:16:31] <SoraFi​restorm> but no, we have to be training unethically, using output data probably illegally, causing even more societal stress in the process, etc etc etc
L266[07:16:32] <Forec​aster> I can't believe you would say that, won't anyone think about the poor cryptobros?!
L267[07:16:36] <as​ie> Personally, I just decided to raise the "why the fuck do my hobbies have to be productive or efficient?" card. It's my hobby. I don't like LLMs. So I won't use them.
L268[07:17:01] <as​ie> In my own projects, I get the say, people can fork it if they don't like it. You know, the same argument Linus Torvalds used.
L269[07:17:31] <as​ie> But for OC that doesn't matter either as the OC upstream is dead
L270[07:18:10] <as​ie> I'm not sure how long this stance will last, though. A lot of the projects I do care about are seeing positive returns from LLM usage, at least in terms of short term efficiency
L271[07:18:36] <Forec​aster> the question is how long these companies will survive
L272[07:18:45] <Forec​aster> haven't a few of them already gone under or are in trouble
L273[07:18:52] <as​ie> Yeah but that's any bubble isn't it?
L274[07:19:00] <as​ie> There's an investment frenzy, most companies die, a few survive
L275[07:19:11] <SoraFi​restorm> I mean... arguably we're already done irreparable damage
L276[07:19:14] <SoraFi​restorm> ie look at rsync
L277[07:19:20] <Re​nno> cost is becoming less of an issue as of late since Chinas efforts have started to pay off
L278[07:19:27] <as​ie> people bring up rsync but they never bring up the various incredible fuckups from the pre-LLM era
L279[07:19:51] <as​ie> like CVE-2008-0166, or the time Steam accidentally wiped hard drives in a rare edge case
L280[07:20:31] <Corded> > <as​ie> I'm not sure how long this stance will last, though. A lot …
L281[07:20:32] <Re​nno> why the emphasis on short term? is there some indication that there is reason to be skeptical of the efficiency gains in a longer time scale?
L282[07:20:48] <as​ie> I am worried about overreliance. Much like people were worried about the overreliance on Wikipedia twenty odd years ago.
L283[07:20:57] <Re​nno> the trend seems to be that they are only improving in effectiveness
L284[07:21:06] <Re​nno> except for googles models... lol
L285[07:21:09] <as​ie> We, as an industry, already have a problem where many old (20+ years) codebases are poorly understood by their current maintainers, I do not think LLMs will make this problem better
L286[07:21:12] <Corded> > <as​ie> I am worried about overreliance. Much like people were worr…
L287[07:21:12] <SoraFi​restorm> Overreliance is already happening, I expected it first hand
L288[07:21:20] <SoraFi​restorm> * experienced
L289[07:21:48] <as​ie> As it's a case of missing information, not inferrable information. And if we give too much of our code maintenance to LLMs, we might end up with a mix of hallucinated and correct information, which is arguably even worse, as it shifts you from "known unknowns" (no docs) to "unknown unknowns" (untrustworthy docs)
L290[07:22:07] <as​ie> I think LLMs will accelerate the issue of code debt/code rot in this way. Thus my concern about long term gains.
L291[07:22:16] <as​ie> This is not an issue invented by LLMs but it's like pouring gasoline on a fire, if you catch my drift?
L292[07:22:19] <SoraFi​restorm> One of the big things working against the LLMs is that being fed LLM output back in causes what is essentially neurological collapse
L293[07:22:40] <SoraFi​restorm> GIGO on an epic scale
L294[07:23:14] <Corded> > <as​ie> I think LLMs will accelerate the issue of code debt/code ro…
L295[07:23:14] <Re​nno> I've definitely noticed, but there are ways around it as I have discovered. A lot of it really comes down to initial design choices and initial design philosophy and creating reliable knowledge systems that are both agent and human navigable
L296[07:23:14] <SoraFi​restorm> Codebases that are already mostly LLM slop are just going to get worse
L297[07:23:34] <Corded> > <Re​nno> I've definitely noticed, but there are ways around it as I …
L298[07:23:34] <as​ie> Yes, and if there's anything my software development experience taught me, it's that the vast majority of companies will sacrifice long term code quality for short term functionality gains.
L299[07:23:46] <as​ie> Because the latter makes money.
L300[07:23:56] <Re​nno> Oh absolutely
L301[07:24:09] <Re​nno> but there are still plenty of solutions and tradeoffs that are possible to make
L302[07:24:35] <SoraFi​restorm> Which was a borderline inevitably before, but LLMs have definitely poured the high-octane fuel on that particular fire
L303[07:24:39] <as​ie> Yes, but also, a lot of code quality ops were only made possible because programmers had a strong negotiating hand. LLMs are weakening this negotiating hand.
L304[07:24:46] <Re​nno> even earlier today I was working with the latest deepseek v4 flash model and doing some self modification of the system prompt to make it smarter and more targeted in it's work
L305[07:25:10] <as​ie> So managers are exerting more pressure, "Claude can do this in 30 minutes" is a literal quote 😉
L306[07:25:23] <as​ie> That I've heard someplace, sometime.
L307[07:25:28] <Corded> > <as​ie> Yes, but also, a lot of code quality ops were only made pos…
L308[07:25:28] <Re​nno> that's why it's time to transition from being the worker
L309[07:25:29] <Re​nno> to being the owner
L310[07:25:46] <Re​nno> who needs managers when you can program and actually leverage the AI better than the supposed manager?
L311[07:26:15] <as​ie> My latest side hustle lent me a net loss. It's not as rosy as it sounds
L312[07:26:44] <as​ie> The companies which will have solid moats will have moats in the areas LLMs can't just slop up for you
L313[07:26:50] <as​ie> And then you're back to square one.
L314[07:27:02] <Re​nno> honestly the thing I'm most grateful for when it comes to OpenComputers is how thoroughly it taught me about effiency
L315[07:27:54] <Corded> > <as​ie> The companies which will have solid moats will have moats i…
L316[07:27:54] <Re​nno> I mean yea it definitely depends on what you're trying to do, but right now there is more potential for programmers to be their own bosses than ever before
L317[07:28:19] <as​ie> I think that starting your own business is still very much a gamble
L318[07:28:27] <as​ie> Especially given, like, you're not the only one thinking like this.
L319[07:28:35] <Re​nno> always was
L320[07:28:50] <Re​nno> but it's now possible
L321[07:29:01] <as​ie> Always has been. One of my friends made that transition in 2015
L322[07:29:02] <Re​nno> competition should only ever be expected
L323[07:29:30] <as​ie> By, once again, using the more efficient tools of his era than the competition. High level scripting languages, modern codebase practices, IDEs, modern database approaches
L324[07:29:32] <Corded> > <as​ie> Always has been. One of my friends made that transition in …
L325[07:29:32] <Re​nno> yea but I bet that was pretty damn hard to do all by themselves unless they had significant cooperation from some other people
L326[07:29:56] <as​ie> It was a matter of identifying a market where the moat was weak
L327[07:30:01] <Re​nno> still hard, but the difference is the tooling at the moment
L328[07:30:01] <as​ie> Weak enough that he could take it on largely by himself
L329[07:30:57] <Re​nno> the ratio of time that I have to actually working on business stuff myself has massively increased now that I can actually reliably delegate work to LLMs
L330[07:31:53] <as​ie> Anyhow. Setting business efficiencies and the ruthlessness of market capitalism aside, I still don't like LLMs, the future is impossible to predict, and I continue to loathe how we as a society just decided to add more festering problems to the festering problems pile
L331[07:31:59] <as​ie> I need to get off this train in a few minutes, so.
L332[07:32:45] <as​ie> Also, the Steam issue I was referencing: <https://github.com/ValveSoftware/steam-for-linux/issues/3671&gt;. CVE-2008-0166 was also wild: <https://github.com/g0tmi1k/debian-ssh&gt;.
L333[07:32:46] <MichiBot> Title: Moved ~/.local/share/steam. Ran steam. It deleted everything on system owned by use​r. | Posted by: keyvin | Posted: Wed Jan 14 23:28:17 UTC 2015 | Status: closed
L334[07:34:02] <as​ie> CVE-2008-0166 was caused by a code analysis tool raised a warning, which the resolution of nerfed OpenSSL's random number generator to the point of making all generated keys much more trivial to crack
L335[07:34:18] <as​ie> So, very much a "computer makes terrible suggestion, human commits, the world blows up" kind of thing...
L336[07:48:33] ⇦ Quits: Hawk777 (~Hawk777@2605:1700:1080:de00:6b5e:19ea:b2ae:826d) (Quit: Leaving.)
L337[07:54:06] <Izzy> should've unionised much earlier
L338[07:55:00] <Izzy> the real gain with these is devaluing labour
L339[07:55:49] <Izzy> Whether it can actually work is irrelevant to "can I use it to pay people less?"
L340[07:56:20] <Izzy> Glad I'm not a programmer but dealing with this shit is miserable.
L341[08:09:22] <as​ie> very much agreed
L342[08:09:35] <as​ie> if we look at the fate of the translation profession in the age of machine learning, they had to deal with it a decade earlier
L343[08:09:38] <as​ie> that's pretty much what happened
L344[08:11:45] <Re​nno> well, times change
L345[08:11:54] <Re​nno> I imagine there were many scribes that were pretty upset about the printing press
L346[08:11:59] <as​ie> i don't think translation changed for the better though as a result
L347[08:12:11] <as​ie> all I see is constant laments about subtitling quality dwindling, all in the name of more profits
L348[08:12:29] <as​ie> not all of those laments are the result of technological progress, but technological progress has caused the conditions for those cost cuts to take place
L349[08:12:41] <as​ie> i think "well, times change" does not invalidate being upset about the changes!
L350[08:13:22] <Corded> > <Re​nno> I imagine there were many scribes that were pretty upset ab…
L351[08:13:22] <as​ie> also, if you want to pull that card, a much better example is the backlash towards sound films
L352[08:13:29] <as​ie> both from actors, producers, and viewers
L353[08:13:35] <as​ie> back when they were being introduced in the interwar period
L354[08:13:48] <Izzy> 2027; year of the haiku desktop?
L355[08:14:26] <as​ie> not really, no. people will stick to Linux
L356[08:14:32] <Izzy> I knowwwwww
L357[08:14:38] <Izzy> A girl can dream
L358[08:14:56] <as​ie> however, I think some hobbyist developers might end up gravitating to projects like Haiku or NetBSD as a result
L359[08:15:03] <as​ie> which might help those projects. just not enough for commercial relevance
L360[08:18:20] <Corded> > <as​ie> i think "well, times change" does not invalidate being upse…
L361[08:18:20] <as​ie> also, in the end, times are humans. we are the times. while i don't think LLMs will leave programming, I do think the backlash to genAI in the arts will persist for some time
L362[08:22:14] <Corded> > <as​ie> not all of those laments are the result of technological pr…
L363[08:22:14] <as​ie> (but also, access to cultural media is seemingly cheaper than ever)
L364[09:30:41] ⇨ Joins: flurry (~flurry@dynamic-002-208-171-083.2.208.pool.telefonica.de)
L365[09:31:10] ⇦ Quits: flurry (~flurry@dynamic-002-208-171-083.2.208.pool.telefonica.de) (Client Quit)
L366[09:34:59] * Amanda meows and looks around
L367[09:35:03] <Amanda> Busy night
L368[09:47:41] <tema​5002> Thought that I should share this here https://discordembeds.pc-logix.com/live/1533410955801657344/1785664061554-2cebab703adb.png
L369[09:55:33] <Amanda> @Renno worth noting, the Oracle v Google copyright fight around java mostly relied on line 10 lines of code. The only reason Oracle lost is because the judge was a programmer and was like "this is the only way to write those 10 lines of code. I've probably written those lines of code!"
L370[09:55:46] <Amanda> On like*
L371[09:56:27] <Amanda> Literally, that's all deploracle could cite as "stolen"
L372[10:01:13] <Amanda> There's literally no way to know if the slop machine is outputting those 10 lines of code that are basically protected as the only way to do something, or literally regurgitating some gpl code. It's very easy to make the slop machine regurgitate it's input verbatim
L373[10:03:57] <Amanda> You can't system prompt your way out of this, because the source info isn't preserved, otherwise they'd have to admit where they stole the code from
L374[10:10:18] * Amanda offers Izzy a single-use doodad that takes your open world game save, and compresses it so the world is smaller
L375[10:10:41] <Amanda> (aka a cardboard box, and a cardboard ring)
L376[10:10:46] <Izzy> compression (squishes your world)
L377[10:11:13] <Amanda> Remember, if you don't do this regularly, your fuel costs are going to go up, as the world expands like a balloon
L378[10:12:28] <Amanda> Also super weird that Nintendo let this game dev put a pokemon centre on the dark side of the moon
L379[10:13:45] <Amanda> Also don't trust the cop duo who show up at suspiciously-well-timed moments whenever you're buying rocket fuel to go to the moon
L380[10:14:21] <Amanda> There's mods to remove them, but they're a pain to install, as the installer assumes you're using home assistant os
L381[10:16:47] ⇦ Quits: KindOne (kindone@2604:a880:400:d0::1f56:d001) (Ping timeout: 201 seconds)
L382[10:17:00] * Amanda settles down atop Izzy's chest, continues meowing about the nonsense from her dream, such as how you have to be careful when you decide to do a race, because the split screen camera will focus on whichever driver is closer to the next story beat, which could leave you 3 screens away and unable to navigate the twisting roads
L383[10:18:47] <Amanda> %choose wake laptop?
L384[10:18:47] <MichiBot> Ama​nda: Ohwouldyoulookatthetime! I suddenly need to be on the other side of the planet!
L385[10:19:03] <Amanda> Wow, rude
L386[10:27:48] *** Joins: KindOne (kindone@68.183.114.86) KindOne
L387[10:32:33] <Amanda> Hrm.. I've gotta figure out how/if I can turn off the automatic home/away/sleep thingy in the thermostat. It's overriding my config via ha
L388[10:45:38] <Forec​aster> just sit next to it and never sleep!
L389[10:48:26] <Spider​EveryOS> %tonk
L390[10:48:27] <MichiBot> Yay! Spider​EveryOS! You beat Forec​aster's previous record of <0 (By 3 hours, 59 minutes and 41 seconds)! I hope you're happy!
L391[10:48:29] <MichiBot> SpiderEveryOS's new record is 3 hours, 59 minutes and 41 seconds! SpiderEveryOS also gained 0.00399 tonk points for stealing the tonk. Position #1.
L392[10:51:19] ⇦ Quits: dustinm` (~dustinm@static.38.6.217.95.clients.your-server.de) (Ping timeout: 201 seconds)
L393[10:55:32] ⇨ Joins: dustinm` (~dustinm@static.38.6.217.95.clients.your-server.de)
L394[11:42:21] <Amanda> %choose wake laptop or start space
L395[11:42:21] <MichiBot> Ama​nda: Is it a bird?! Is it a plane?! No! It's "wake laptop"!
L396[11:48:18] <Forec​aster> that's one way to wake it up I suppose
L397[13:03:30] ⇨ Joins: George (~George@188.163.92.223)
L398[13:04:08] <George> Hello
L399[13:04:41] ⇦ Quits: George (~George@188.163.92.223) (Client Quit)
L400[13:07:16] <Forec​aster> kbye
L401[13:08:22] <Brisingr​ Aerowing> +
L402[13:37:23] <Amanda> Unlike the steam controller, my laptop does not emit the Wilhelm scream when thrown
L403[13:38:29] <Amanda> Now that we've left the campgrounds, I can say this: Camping next to a roller coaster is like camping near a beach full of thallophobic people. Sounds liks waves, witht he occasional scream
L404[14:20:36] <Mic​hiyo> Ugh fuckin robots are broken....
L405[14:35:22] <Forec​aster> Are they in warranty?
L406[14:59:24] <Mic​hiyo> checks the release date of robots in the mod.
L407[14:59:25] <Mic​hiyo> No
L408[15:05:16] <Forec​aster> Well shoot, gonna have to pay a fortune to repair them then
L409[15:20:49] <Spider​EveryOS> %tonkout
L410[15:20:51] <MichiBot> Willikers! Spider​EveryOS! You beat your own previous record of 3 hours, 59 minutes and 41 seconds (By 32 minutes and 41 seconds)! I hope you're happy!
L411[15:20:52] <MichiBot> Spider​EveryOS has tonked out! Tonk has been reset! They gained 0.004 tonk points! plus 0.006 bonus points for consecutive hours! Current score: 2.5489906, Position #1
L412[16:01:02] <Mic​hiyo> sigh ok took a bit to trace it down, but fixed.
L413[16:23:11] <Forec​aster> at least it didn't take two bits, or eight
L414[16:57:03] ⇨ Joins: Novexx (~Novexx@104.145.210.100)
L415[17:20:40] * Amanda meows and looks around
L416[17:20:41] * Amanda orders MichiBot some %soup % for lunch
L417[17:20:41] <MichiBot> Waiter!! Waiter!! Theres Dollar Store Thor in my soup!
L418[17:23:28] <Amanda> %choose tablet or tv
L419[17:23:28] <MichiBot> Ama​nda: The sands of time whisper to me... they're saying "tv".
L420[17:47:33] ⇦ Quits: Novexx (~Novexx@104.145.210.100) (Remote host closed the connection)
L421[17:57:32] <Forec​aster> %tonk
L422[17:57:33] <MichiBot> By my throth! Forec​aster! You beat Spider​EveryOS's previous record of <0 (By 2 hours, 36 minutes and 42 seconds)! I hope you're happy!
L423[17:57:34] <MichiBot> Forecaster's new record is 2 hours, 36 minutes and 42 seconds! Forecaster also gained 0.00261 tonk points for stealing the tonk. Position #2. Need 0.2326612 more points to pass Spider​EveryOS!
L424[17:57:36] <Forec​aster> and also %sip
L425[17:57:37] <MichiBot> You drink a hot black potion (New!). Forecaster now has a mullet until they have a diluted potion.
L426[17:57:44] <Forec​aster> D:
L427[17:57:52] <Va​ur> %chug
L428[17:57:52] <MichiBot> You drink a liquid honey potion (New!). The potion bottle insults Vaur's haircut.
L429[18:35:22] <Forec​aster> %sip diluted
L430[18:35:22] <MichiBot> You drink a diluted cerulium potion (New!). Forecaster: Nothing seemed to happen...
L431[18:35:36] <Forec​aster> at least it cured the mullet situation
L432[18:45:41] <SoraFi​restorm> @Michiyo since you are putting a bunch of effort into making the 1.21 port presentable, least I can do for you is be a test subject when you are ready for it
L433[19:06:35] <Corded> > <SoraFi​restorm> @Michiyo since you are putting a bunch of effort into makin…
L434[19:06:35] <Mic​hiyo> https://www.curseforge.com/minecraft/mc-mods/opencomputers-rebooted/files/all?page=1&pageSize=20&showAlphaFiles=show Sure, watch for 1.9.2 to be approved and you can check it out.
L435[19:06:35] <Mic​hiyo> You'll also need https://www.curseforge.com/minecraft/mc-mods/scalable-cats-force Until I eventually get sick of Scala and port it out. :P
L436[19:07:21] <Corded> > <SoraFi​restorm> reacted :yebuddyts: to <Mic​hiyo> https://www.curseforge.com/minecraft/mc-mods/opencomputers-rebooted/files/all?p…
L437[19:08:24] <Mic​hiyo> Please break it, let me know what you find. I'm sure there are problems. Like I said I've been ripping out as much of the LLM cruft as I can. And I've discovered a number of issues on my own, and I'm not even GOOD with OC or Lua. Lol
L438[19:09:26] <Mic​hiyo> I'm not used to CF taking so long to approve one of my files. Though I guess most of my mods are A LOT smaller than OC.
L439[19:09:44] <Forec​aster> I thought you were a licensed Lua-tichian!
L440[19:09:59] <Mic​hiyo> I can iterate a loop!
L441[19:10:10] <Brisingr​ Aerowing> New projects tend to take a bit for some reason
L442[19:10:20] <Brisingr​ Aerowing> More checks methinks
L443[19:10:28] <Mic​hiyo> Also, I'm open to PRs and ANY suggestions.
L444[19:10:41] <Forec​aster> Suggestion: more cowbell
L445[19:10:45] <Brisingr​ Aerowing> I may look later.
L446[19:10:52] <Corded> > <Forec​aster> Suggestion: more cowbell
L447[19:10:52] <Mic​hiyo> Will add a cowbell component.
L448[19:10:54] <Mic​hiyo> :P
L449[19:11:00] <Mic​hiyo> Hmmm...
L450[19:11:14] <Mic​hiyo> Change to beep to let you specify beep or cowbell.
L451[19:11:20] <Forec​aster> it's so we can ping the cows, of course
L452[19:13:41] <Corded> > <SoraFi​restorm> @Michiyo since you are putting a bunch of effort into makin…
L453[19:13:42] <Mic​hiyo> Approved!
L454[19:14:12] <SoraFi​restorm> Great, will look at it when I get home
L455[19:14:23] <Mic​hiyo> Thanks. i've gotta run some errands.
L456[19:15:28] <Mic​hiyo> https://github.com/CaitlynMainer/OpenComputers I'll also be moving dev builds to jenkins as I hate how Github does releases. So dev builds will be Jenkins, then releases will go to CF.
L457[19:16:35] <SoraFi​restorm> You are amazing and great. TYSM for working this port.
L458[19:18:22] *** Joins: Hawk777 (~Hawk777@2605:1700:1080:de00:68f:cdfa:7cf4:7d3d) Hawk777
L459[20:16:27] <Corded> > <Mic​hiyo> https://github.com/CaitlynMainer/OpenComputers I'll also b…
L460[20:16:27] <as​ie> wait what the fuck?
L461[20:16:33] <as​ie> amazing
L462[20:16:34] <as​ie> OC is saved
L463[20:16:57] <as​ie> if you're starting from the 1.20.1 code, I think it is based on the 1.16.5 code, and so it might be missing a bunch of the patches I made in the last year or two
L464[20:16:59] <Mic​hiyo> Oh hay asie
L465[20:17:18] <Mic​hiyo> Yeah, most likely
L466[20:17:25] <Mic​hiyo> * hey
L467[20:17:53] <Mic​hiyo> I'll work on porting stuff forward.
L468[20:23:53] ⇦ Quits: xal (~xal@mx1.xal.systems) (Quit: bye)
L469[20:24:21] ⇨ Joins: xal (~xal@mx1.xal.systems)
L470[20:24:44] ⇦ Quits: xal (~xal@mx1.xal.systems) (Client Quit)
L471[20:26:16] ⇨ Joins: xal (~xal@mx1.xal.systems)
L472[20:26:35] <Corded> > <Mic​hiyo> I'll work on porting stuff forward.
L473[20:26:35] <as​ie> if you need any advice, make sure to ping me
L474[20:26:41] <as​ie> and I mean ping me, I don't lurk this place much anymore
L475[20:26:46] <Corded> > <Mic​hiyo> reacted 👍 to <as​ie> if you need any advice, make sure to ping me
L476[20:27:01] <as​ie> make my Discord light up like a mrbeast scam
L477[20:27:04] <as​ie> then I might even notice
L478[20:29:52] <Kristo​bear38> Are there any expectations around what works/what should/what doesn't?
L479[20:33:53] <Corded> > <Mic​hiyo> reacted 😂 to <as​ie> make my Discord light up like a mrbeast scam
L480[20:34:20] <Mic​hiyo> No, the hope is it's all there except the updates asie has made.
L481[20:35:41] <Mic​hiyo> I folded OpenPrinter into OC directly. And the 1.20 porter merged in OpenScreens (without permission, but I got permission)
L482[20:40:37] <Kristo​bear38> what kind of help do you need the most? testing? fixing regressions? anything else?
L483[20:40:46] <Mic​hiyo> Yes. lol
L484[20:41:21] <Mic​hiyo> Testing for sure, cause I was never an "advanced" user.
L485[20:41:44] <Mic​hiyo> My goal is to keep it as compatible with the OG as possible
L486[20:42:27] <Kristo​bear38> sure
L487[20:43:29] <Mic​hiyo> So the little things I've tested seem to work well enough... but like ANYTHING above noob is gonna be an issue for me :P
L488[20:43:50] ⇦ Quits: Vexatos (~Vexatos@2001:4647:af75:0:bb33:d464:9e18:52bb) (Quit: Insert quantum chemistry joke here)
L489[20:44:08] <Mic​hiyo> Then maybe I can bribe Vex to update Computronics to 1.21.1 :P
L490[20:45:36] <SoraFi​restorm> I'll try to stress it as much as I can
L491[20:46:12] <SoraFi​restorm> In the past I wasn't ever a super heavy user, though I did have some computers and robots employed
L492[20:47:40] <SoraFi​restorm> We should still have access to mod-provided CC interop APIs, right? Will almost certainly end up tasking computers to interact with Create if possible
L493[20:59:22] <Mic​hiyo> Yeah, it has the Create compat. I removed a bunch of dead compat code, and I'll be re-adding it slowly
L494[21:02:33] <Corded> > <SoraFi​restorm> reacted :yebuddyts: to <Mic​hiyo> Yeah, it has the Create compat. I removed a bunch of dead compat code, and I'll…
L495[21:13:20] <Mic​hiyo> Mind, I've not TESTED that create compat, so IDK WTF it does :D
L496[22:01:13] <Spider​EveryOS> %tonk
L497[22:01:13] <MichiBot> Geez! Spider​EveryOS! You beat Forec​aster's previous record of 2 hours, 36 minutes and 42 seconds (By 1 hour, 26 minutes and 58 seconds)! I hope you're happy!
L498[22:01:14] <MichiBot> SpiderEveryOS's new record is 4 hours, 3 minutes and 41 seconds! SpiderEveryOS also gained 0.00435 (0.00145 x 3) tonk points for stealing the tonk. Position #1.
L499[23:16:32] <Amanda> %choose halucinate or irradiate
L500[23:16:32] <MichiBot> Ama​nda: The sands of time whisper to me... they're saying "halucinate".
L501[23:48:59] <SoraFi​restorm> https://paste.pc-logix.com/ajiyucunir
L502[23:49:24] <SoraFi​restorm> I can toss you full logs if you need them
L503[23:49:39] <Mic​hiyo> o_O what? I'm running it right now.... That's the build from CF?
L504[23:49:43] <SoraFi​restorm> yeah
L505[23:49:50] <SoraFi​restorm> I downloaded it via Prism Launcher's built-in thing
L506[23:50:04] <SoraFi​restorm> it's own mod downloader; I didn't download from CF manually
L507[23:50:45] <SoraFi​restorm> I have generally not had a problem using PM's built-in grabber
L508[23:50:59] <Mic​hiyo> .... the jar on CF is corrupt?
L509[23:51:26] <Mic​hiyo> https://discordembeds.pc-logix.com/live/1533623291338559529/1785714686105-9470031c0736.jar
L510[23:51:26] <SoraFi​restorm> My md5sum for `opencomputers-v1.9.2.jar` is `62628e4777d4f9b12487012a81713e8f`
L511[23:51:31] <Mic​hiyo> ignore the 1.9.1
L512[23:51:52] <Mic​hiyo> Actually I'm going to run a fresh build
L513[23:53:17] <Mic​hiyo> Ok NOW you can ignore the 1.9.1 this is fresh off the gradle build https://discordembeds.pc-logix.com/live/1533623754331263096/1785714796465-38642e2df978.jar
L514[23:54:08] <Mic​hiyo> Yeah... the CF build is corrupt what the hell
L515[23:55:22] <SoraFi​restorm> that ^^^ booted
L516[23:56:26] <Mic​hiyo> OH FUCKSAKE
L517[23:56:43] <SoraFi​restorm> mood honestly
L518[23:58:12] <SoraFi​restorm> Recipe for EEPROM seems goofed
L519[23:58:25] <SoraFi​restorm> https://discordembeds.pc-logix.com/live/1533625046621360359/1785715104723-2ee077595320.png
L520[23:58:39] <SoraFi​restorm> https://discordembeds.pc-logix.com/live/1533625108520898630/1785715119423-f820bec4f594.png
L521[23:58:47] <Mic​hiyo> Hmmm
L522[23:59:08] <Mic​hiyo> That's what I get for assuming that the recipes would port forward from 1.12 :P
L523[23:59:35] <SoraFi​restorm> Also, please keep in mind this is a test pack that has '124 mods' according to the title screen count
L524[23:59:52] <SoraFi​restorm> so anything I report might be down to weird cross-interactions
<<Prev Next>> Scroll to Top