L15[04:57:17] <Eddi|zuHause> if we haven't heard anything from the crew by now, probably not :p

L16[04:57:21] <Eddi|zuHause> !mission

L17[04:57:21] <LunchBot> Bill installs a TV so large it clips through the walls. The FAA grounds you for another hundred years.

L18[04:58:00] <Althego> good

L19[04:58:06] <Althego> the punishment for the tv

L20[04:58:22] <raptop> Bill should have known that part clipping was demonic

L21[04:58:29] <Althego> it could be compounded by an other crime, like using a smart tv

L22[04:58:41] <raptop> !outcome pope condems

L23[04:58:41] <LunchBot> No outcome found matching "pope condems".

L24[04:58:48] <raptop> !outcome vatican

L25[04:58:48] <LunchBot> Your use of part clipping is denounced by the Vatican as demonic.

L26[04:59:25] <Eddi|zuHause> !outcome condemn

L27[04:59:25] <LunchBot> No outcome found matching "condemn".

L28[05:00:31] <Althego> hehe

L31[05:12:21] <raptop> in which my spelling error doesn't matter?

L32[05:16:56] <Eddi|zuHause> !outcome add Turns out the spelling mistakes didn't matter.

L33[05:16:56] <LunchBot> Added outcome: Turns out the spelling mistakes didn't matter.

L34[05:17:35] <Eddi|zuHause> !mission

L35[05:17:36] <LunchBot> You open the Gate of Babylon. But how?

L36[05:17:50] <Eddi|zuHause> asking the big questions now...

L37[05:19:07] <XXCoder> easy one though

L38[05:19:13] <XXCoder> grasp a handle. pull

L39[05:19:21] <XXCoder> push if theres sign to say push

L40[05:19:39] <Eddi|zuHause> do you know the babylonian word for push?

L41[05:20:04] <XXCoder> I dont but im sure someone knows ;)

L42[05:20:29] <Eddi|zuHause> you see, every question just breeds more questions. never an answer.

L43[05:21:04] <Eddi|zuHause> it's questions all the way down

L44[05:21:14] <XXCoder> its best scam of all

L45[05:21:21] <XXCoder> scientists will never be done

L48[05:23:33] <raptop> So what's on the other side of the gate, anyway? Gozer?

L49[05:23:55] <Eddi|zuHause> only one way to find out...

L52[05:31:24] <Eddi|zuHause> !outcome add When will you ever learn.

L53[05:31:24] <LunchBot> Added outcome: When will you ever learn.

L54[05:32:29] <Eddi|zuHause> !outcome add The eyes of children widen whenever they hear this tale.

L55[05:32:29] <LunchBot> Added outcome: The eyes of children widen whenever they hear this tale.

L56[05:32:56] <raptop> !outcome nightmare

L57[05:32:56] <LunchBot> You succeed beyond your wildest nightmares.

L58[05:32:58] <raptop> !outcome nightmare

L59[05:32:58] <LunchBot> You discover the real reason it's called CASE NIGHTMARE GREEN.

L60[05:33:01] <raptop> !outcome nightmare

L61[05:33:01] <LunchBot> You discover the real reason it's called CASE NIGHTMARE GREEN.

L62[05:33:04] <raptop> hrm

L63[05:33:20] <raptop> ah

L64[05:33:23] <raptop> !outcome memories

L65[05:33:24] <LunchBot> Years later, you sometimes wake up in a cold sweat from the memories of their screams.

L66[05:34:00] <Eddi|zuHause> !mission

L67[05:34:00] <LunchBot> You question the value of orbital mechanics software written in FORTRAN. A kerbal has gone missing.

L68[05:34:28] <Eddi|zuHause> i think this is backwards :p

L69[05:35:50] <raptop> The kerbal would have been trackable with the previous software!

L70[05:36:07] <raptop> anyway, I'm like 80% certain that the mission is refrencing MERCURY6

L71[05:37:10] <Eddi|zuHause> i'd put it in the category of "REAL programmers use <X>"

L72[05:38:19] <Eddi|zuHause> otherwise, FORTRAN is probably not the worst language to write a phyisics simulation with

L73[05:38:40] <Althego> there is nothign wrong with fortran

L74[05:39:04] <Eddi|zuHause> it was probably THE BIG THING like 40 years ago

L75[05:39:31] <Althego> by that time it was old

L76[05:39:49] <Eddi|zuHause> s/old/well tested/ :p

L77[05:40:09] <Althego> fortran is one of the first programming languages

L78[05:40:25] <Althego> modern fortran is even livable

L79[05:41:13] <Eddi|zuHause> but there is a "fortran 90"

L80[05:41:54] <Althego> that is old too there are newer ones

L81[05:42:11] <Eddi|zuHause> but it would have been new 40 years ago

L82[05:42:29] <Althego> 90 is 33 years away

L83[05:43:04] <Althego> 77 is kind of dumb

L84[05:43:16] <Althego> but basically most old code is built on some variant of that

L85[05:43:33] <Althego> looking at you nonstandard extensions in dec fortran

L86[05:52:48] <Althego> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yekMWWcpfOA

L87[05:53:18] <raptop> !mission add You use your exhaust plume to perform a Rapid Unscheduled Dig.

L88[05:53:19] <LunchBot> Added mission: You use your exhaust plume to perform a Rapid Unscheduled Dig.

L89[05:56:00] <Izzy> spengies moment

L103[11:37:35] <darsie> 1337

L107[12:45:11] <KrazyKrl> ;mission satinist

L108[12:45:11] <LunchBot> No mission found matching "satinist".

L109[12:45:27] <KrazyKrl> ;mission add Your crew become satinists.

L110[12:45:28] <LunchBot> Added mission: Your crew become satinists.

L111[12:45:36] <KrazyKrl> ;mission

L112[12:45:36] <LunchBot> You launch an epic mission destined to bring the Magic Boulder back to Kerbin. The mission is a success, but your efforts went unnoticed: everyone was watching a cool new TV show.

L113[12:45:56] <Althego> hehe

L114[12:47:46] <sandbox> ;mission satirist

L115[12:47:46] <LunchBot> No mission found matching "satirist".

L116[12:50:16] <KrazyKrl> ;mission wrong on the internet

L117[12:50:16] <LunchBot> No mission found matching "wrong on the internet".

L118[12:50:38] <KrazyKrl> ;mission add You attempt to correct a wrong statement on the internet.

L119[12:50:38] <LunchBot> Added mission: You attempt to correct a wrong statement on the internet.

L120[12:50:49] <KrazyKrl> ;mission

L121[12:50:50] <LunchBot> You upgrade your shipboard computers to Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. Your mission devolves into a debate over whether its name is an acronym or an initialism.

L122[12:51:34] <Althego> 14.04 lol

L123[12:51:39] <Althego> 9 years

L124[12:51:50] <packbart> well, it's "long term"

L125[12:52:01] <Althego> even long term support must have expired by now

L126[12:52:20] <packbart> your space program doesn't care

L127[12:52:33] <SporkWitch> LTS releases are on 2 year release schedules, and 6 year support schedules, IIRC

L128[12:53:29] <Althego> end of standard support 2019

L129[12:53:43] <Althego> bu end of life is only in 2024

L130[12:54:30] <SporkWitch> correction, for ubuntu it's only 5 years now, 10 if you pay them; i was right about the every 2 years there's a new LTS, though

L131[12:55:18] <KrazyKrl> ;outcome dadly

L132[12:55:18] <LunchBot> No outcome found matching "dadly".

L133[12:55:35] <Althego> https://twitter.com/Erdayastronaut/status/1652506392333352960

L134[12:55:45] <KrazyKrl> ;outcome add Your father arrives; and vents all sorts of dadly radiation.

L135[12:55:45] <LunchBot> Added outcome: Your father arrives; and vents all sorts of dadly radiation.

L136[12:56:08] <Althego> every two years for debian too, but thy seem to be on odd years while ubuntu is on even years

L137[12:56:39] <SporkWitch> makes sense, since ubuntu is downstream from debian; gives them time to play with and modify the upstream debian LTS for their own LTS.

L138[12:57:07] <SporkWitch> also, 2024 for 140.04 is only if you PAID for extended support; mainline support ended in 2019

L139[12:57:12] <Althego> debian is more conservative, the stable is already 1-2 years old when it is released

L140[12:57:22] <SporkWitch> https://ubuntu.com/about/release-cycle

L141[12:57:27] <Althego> ubuntu probably starts out fro mtesting or outright from sid

L142[12:57:49] <KrazyKrl> ;mission add You change your rocket from being perfectly round; to your rocket being practically round.

L143[12:57:49] <LunchBot> Added mission: You change your rocket from being perfectly round; to your rocket being practically round.

L144[12:57:59] <Althego> kinetic kudu and lunar lobster

L145[12:58:06] <Althego> who comes up with these names

L146[12:58:14] <KrazyKrl> humans

L147[12:58:35] <Althego> but anyway debian is an utter failure in naming. buster bullseye bookworm. congratulations you named 3 subsequent versions starting with bu

L148[12:59:01] <Althego> it may be ok for them

L149[12:59:05] <SporkWitch> i for one pay attention to the codename in deciding what to install *eyeroll* lol

L150[12:59:11] <Althego> but i have never seen any toy story, so for me these are just strings

L151[13:01:21] <Althego> so at least for ubuntu you know the ordering by the initial letters

L152[13:11:15] <KrazyKrl> ;mission detroit

L153[13:11:15] <LunchBot> No mission found matching "detroit".

L154[13:11:35] <KrazyKrl> ;mission add Your rocket makes an emergency "landing" in Detroit.

L155[13:11:35] <LunchBot> Added mission: Your rocket makes an emergency "landing" in Detroit.

L156[13:43:13] <KrazyKrl> ;mission

L157[13:43:14] <LunchBot> You expand your rocket into a Taylor series. Some baffles added to your O'Neill cylinder prevent the unwanted hurricanes.

L165[15:08:33] <Eddi|zuHause> !mission

L166[15:08:33] <LunchBot> You conduct a rendezvous rescue mission. You succeed, but the save corrupts, you forgot to take images, and no one believes you.

L167[15:09:06] <Eddi|zuHause> whatever

L168[15:09:19] <Eddi|zuHause> why would i care what anyone thinks anyway.

L169[15:09:53] <Eddi|zuHause> i'm a strong person on my own

L170[15:13:30] <minas_tirith> Eddi|zuHause, hi

L175[16:24:59] <raptop> !mission

L176[16:24:59] <LunchBot> You don't use correct grammar. Your ship is crushed into a small 1:4:9 rectangular prism.

L177[16:25:17] <raptop> And *that* is why grammar is important

L178[16:25:20] <Althego> hehe

L179[16:25:29] <Althego> somebody must have misunderstood something

L180[16:25:34] <FLHerne> ;outcome add The mission conclusively demonstrates overcaniality, but the naysayers refuse to accept it.

L181[16:25:34] <LunchBot> Added outcome: The mission conclusively demonstrates overcaniality, but the naysayers refuse to accept it.

L182[16:25:42] <Althego> also bonus for the 2001 reference

L183[16:26:12] <Althego> what is overcaniality

L184[16:27:13] <raptop> overcanality botes?

L185[16:27:36] <FLHerne> !stupid overcaniality

L186[16:27:37] <LunchBot> According to contemporary scientific theory regarding comparative velocity measurement, all moving objects can be classified into two distinct categories vis-a-vis their velocity potential relative to that of a dog '(Canis lupus familiaris)'. The categories comprise overcaniality (potential for velocities above the maximum possible velocity of a dog) and undercaniality (lacking of the potential for velocities above the maximum possible velocity of a dog).

L187[16:27:59] <FLHerne> !stupid Oort cloud

L188[16:27:59] <LunchBot> "One common argument against the current scientific consensus on overcaniality opines that there are numerous objects (i.e. airplanes, satellites, Oort cloud objects) that travel at or above the maximum possible velocity of a dog. However, this argument has been largely refuted in that velocity measurements of such objects did not take into account contributing factors such as orbital parallax or string theory."

L189[16:28:01] <Althego> heh

L190[16:28:39] <raptop> hm

L191[16:29:08] <FLHerne> I suppose a lot hinges on how you define "possible"

L192[16:30:08] <FLHerne> In principle you could accelerate a dog until its protons collapse or whatever that limit was

L206[19:05:50] <Althego> possible falcon heavy launch https://youtu.be/YFbp6PVbJQA

L208[19:24:35] <packbart> hm. TheRegister uses "maximum velocity of a sheep in a vacuum", they probably should add dogspeed to the converter

L214[22:20:37] <Az> !mission

L215[22:20:37] <LunchBot> You rewire the comms to play ghetto rap. Kerbals nuke Earth from orbit, just to be sure.

L216[22:20:52] <Az> sounds about right