L27[07:06:01] <NGC3982> renaming stages would be neat

L28[07:59:50] <NGC3982> i guess theres a mod for that

L51[13:39:39] <Althego> kikkerikii

L52[13:49:25] <raptop> .

L53[13:52:12] <SporkWitch> whoo! got one of the fake spacex youtube accounts deleted!

L54[13:53:15] <raptop> \o/

L55[13:53:52] <SporkWitch> it was pretending to be the docking livestream like 5 hours before the actual stream started, and the chat was nothing but the channel itself spamming a crypto scam

L56[13:55:20] <Althego> drop in the bucket

L57[13:55:45] <SporkWitch> still, nice to know sometimes it actually works

L58[13:56:10] <Althego> probably others reported it too

L59[13:56:57] <SporkWitch> honestly, i don't know why they don't auto-nuke channels that have identical names to verified channels, or at least prevent them from setting an identical name. Wouldn't solve all of it, but it's an easy thing to automate and help prevent some victims.

L60[13:57:23] <SporkWitch> almost certainly, but if we don't report on the assumption that someone else will, then no one reports.

L61[13:59:05] <Althego> therei s a societal issue, the called something like the missing hero. when nobody does anything because they assume somebody else did or will

L62[13:59:27] <Althego> so yes, it is better to do it even if somebody else did too

L63[13:59:35] <SporkWitch> yup

L64[13:59:46] <SporkWitch> deal with it all the time with people whinging uselessly about bugs. STOP WHINGING AND REPORT IT

L65[14:00:45] <SporkWitch> working in support i see tickets all the time along the lines of "this has been happening for months"; well then why are you only just now opening a ticket? lol. They're always super frustrated and its their own fault for not seeking support BEFORE they were pissed from putting up with it for months lol

L66[14:02:01] <SporkWitch> as a rule, if there's a formal support offering available, and depending on complexity an issue takes me more than a couple hours to a couple days and I can't fix it, i'm contacting support. I've done my due dilligence, checked what I can think to, and if support is competent that'll speed things along since we can skip what's already been done.

L67[14:09:10] <Deddly> Good for you, SporkWitch

L74[17:15:13] <Althego> heh i forgot about the electron launch

L75[17:15:16] <Althego> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TffmQR1K04M

L78[18:25:23] <raptop> !misison add You attempt to HOLD HOLD HOLD a lit SRB.

L79[18:25:35] <Althego> lol

L90[20:09:00] <raptop> !outcome luck ran out

L91[20:09:00] <LunchBot> No outcome found matching "luck ran out".

L92[20:09:02] <raptop> hm

L93[20:10:34] <raptop> !mission

L94[20:10:34] <LunchBot> You subject FOOF to ozonolysis in spite of the dire warnings not to. This will be fixed in the next version.

L95[20:20:05] <raptop> !outcome 511

L96[20:20:05] <LunchBot> You learn the hard way that a containment failure is not just a burst of 511 keV gammas, but also a shower of pions which *then* decay into MeV-GeV gammas, muons, and beta particles.

L97[20:21:14] <raptop> !outcome add Just imagine how much worse it would be for your space program if you *hadn't* unlocked additional launch sites before that test.

L98[20:21:15] <LunchBot> Added outcome: Just imagine how much worse it would be for your space program if you *hadn't* unlocked additional launch sites before that test.

L111[23:06:01] <SporkWitch> spacex launch scrubbed, apparently; stream rescheduled for tomorrow