L2[00:52:24] ⇦
Quits: Hawk777
(Hawk777!~chead@2607:c000:81db:1b00:60a2:3d29:4f46:ae5c) (Quit:
Leaving.)
L3[01:01:22] 
<Night's Edge> wtf...?
<Night's Edge> wtf...?L4[01:01:38] <Night's Edge> Why is this what
comes through now of all times...?
<Night's Edge> Why is this what
comes through now of all times...?L5[01:40:32] ⇦
Quits: manmaed (manmaed!~Ender@stargate.manmaed.exofire.net) (*.net
*.split)
L6[01:40:45] ⇨
Joins: manmaed
(manmaed!~Ender@stargate.manmaed.exofire.net)
L7[03:24:08] ⇨
Joins: MCenderdragon
(MCenderdragon!~MCenderdr@46.78.253.255)
L9[06:11:53] ⇨
Joins: Vexatos
(Vexatos!~Vexatos@p200300C107205E55E4613D86E803FE4C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
L10[08:09:29] <crazyminer63> Why did I just now find
this. And I wonder why he disappeared off of youtube.
<crazyminer63> Why did I just now find
this. And I wonder why he disappeared off of youtube.L11[09:00:07] ⇦
Quits: Herobrine (Herobrine!~1@47.199.235.16) (Read error:
Connection reset by peer)
L12[09:00:38] ⇨
Joins: Herobrine (Herobrine!~1@47.199.235.16)
L13[11:46:25] <fLAK>
@texaswriter @CovertJaguar thanks
<fLAK>
@texaswriter @CovertJaguar thanksL14[11:53:16] <fLAK>
btw I just noticed there's two different booster tracks, the
vanilla one, and one added by RC, what's the difference?
<fLAK>
btw I just noticed there's two different booster tracks, the
vanilla one, and one added by RC, what's the difference?L15[11:53:28] ⇦
Quits: Vexatos
(Vexatos!~Vexatos@p200300C107205E55E4613D86E803FE4C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
(Quit: Insert quantum chemistry joke here)
L18[11:55:06] ⇨
Joins: Vexatos
(Vexatos!~Vexatos@p200300C107205E55E4613D86E803FE4C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
L19[11:55:20] <liach>
@fLAK rc ones are based on kits. you don't need to craft the
rc one; you can just place the booster kit on the regular
tracks
<liach>
@fLAK rc ones are based on kits. you don't need to craft the
rc one; you can just place the booster kit on the regular
tracksL20[11:56:20] <fLAK>
yeah but do the vanilla one and RC one function the same?
<fLAK>
yeah but do the vanilla one and RC one function the same?L21[12:02:00] <liach>
rc ones drop the kit when broken and turns into track; vanilla ones
just drop itself
<liach>
rc ones drop the kit when broken and turns into track; vanilla ones
just drop itselfL22[12:02:09] <liach>
function should be the same
<liach>
function should be the sameL23[12:02:54] <fLAK>
interesting, ok thanks
<fLAK>
interesting, ok thanksL24[12:27:34] <liach>
prefer rc ones. rc ones (booster track kit) can be applied on
abandoned/wooden/electric track types
<liach>
prefer rc ones. rc ones (booster track kit) can be applied on
abandoned/wooden/electric track typesL25[12:27:51] <liach>
and high speed as well
<liach>
and high speed as wellL26[12:49:18] ⇦
Quits: Vexatos
(Vexatos!~Vexatos@p200300C107205E55E4613D86E803FE4C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
(Quit: Insert quantum chemistry joke here)
L27[12:49:32] ⇨
Joins: Vexatos
(Vexatos!~Vexatos@p200300C107205E55E4613D86E803FE4C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
L28[12:51:10] <fLAK>
are electric reinforced tracks planned?
<fLAK>
are electric reinforced tracks planned?L29[13:15:39] ⇨
Joins: SatanicSanta
(SatanicSanta!~SatanicSa@c-24-22-63-87.hsd1.or.comcast.net)
L30[14:52:58] ⇨
Joins: ImQ009
(ImQ009!~ImQ009@89-64-44-95.dynamic.chello.pl)
L31[15:11:03] ⇨
Joins: travis-ci
(travis-ci!~travis-ci@ec2-54-224-167-176.compute-1.amazonaws.com)
L32[15:11:04] ⇦
Parts: travis-ci
(travis-ci!~travis-ci@ec2-54-224-167-176.compute-1.amazonaws.com)
())
L33[15:11:04] <travis-ci> Build details :
https://travis-ci.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/builds/96116359
L34[15:11:04] <travis-ci> Change view :
https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/compare/a05a3bd813ef...e919b751fd28
L35[15:11:04] <travis-ci>
Railcraft/Railcraft#205 (mc-1.12.2 - e919b75 : Trinsdar): The build
passed.
L36[15:59:56] ⇦
Quits: ImQ009 (ImQ009!~ImQ009@89-64-44-95.dynamic.chello.pl) (Quit:
Leaving)
L37[16:58:29] ⇦
Quits: SatanicSanta
(SatanicSanta!~SatanicSa@c-24-22-63-87.hsd1.or.comcast.net) (Quit:
KVIrc 4.3.1 Aria http://www.kvirc.net/)
L38[17:10:40] <liach>
i would like to see it as well. easy to add in theory
<liach>
i would like to see it as well. easy to add in theoryL39[17:47:33] <fLAK>
also maybe buff reinforced tracks a bit, like have them 150% speed
of normal tracks since HS are 300%?
<fLAK>
also maybe buff reinforced tracks a bit, like have them 150% speed
of normal tracks since HS are 300%?L40[17:49:15] <fLAK>
I'll post the suggestion on github tomorrow after work
<fLAK>
I'll post the suggestion on github tomorrow after workL41[17:56:48] <LuigiHutch> I believe thats an
intentional design decision
<LuigiHutch> I believe thats an
intentional design decisionL42[18:25:13] <CovertJaguar> no... its actually a
design limitation
<CovertJaguar> no... its actually a
design limitationL43[18:25:26] <CovertJaguar> any faster and tracks
just kind of stop being tracks
<CovertJaguar> any faster and tracks
just kind of stop being tracksL44[18:25:49] <CovertJaguar> the simulation speed
just isn't fast enough to keep up
<CovertJaguar> the simulation speed
just isn't fast enough to keep upL45[18:26:02] <CovertJaguar> its why HS tracks are
the way they are
<CovertJaguar> its why HS tracks are
the way they areL46[18:27:47] <CovertJaguar> I buffed the reinforced
track as high as I could and maintain reliability, even then I had
to use a dynamic speed controller to adjust max speed for slopes
and corners
<CovertJaguar> I buffed the reinforced
track as high as I could and maintain reliability, even then I had
to use a dynamic speed controller to adjust max speed for slopes
and cornersL47[18:31:33] <CovertJaguar> I'm fairly certain
the default track speed of 0.4 tiles per tick was choses
specifically because it fastest the simulation could support
<CovertJaguar> I'm fairly certain
the default track speed of 0.4 tiles per tick was choses
specifically because it fastest the simulation could supportL48[18:32:19] <CovertJaguar> I'm fairly certain
the default track speed of 0.4 tiles per tick was chosen
specifically because it fastest the simulation could support
[Edited]
<CovertJaguar> I'm fairly certain
the default track speed of 0.4 tiles per tick was chosen
specifically because it fastest the simulation could support
[Edited]L49[18:32:33] <CovertJaguar> I'm fairly certain
the default track speed of 0.4 tiles per tick was chosen
specifically because it was the fastest the simulation could
support [Edited]
<CovertJaguar> I'm fairly certain
the default track speed of 0.4 tiles per tick was chosen
specifically because it was the fastest the simulation could
support [Edited]L50[18:53:22] ⇨
Joins: travis-ci
(travis-ci!~travis-ci@ec2-54-159-124-167.compute-1.amazonaws.com)
L51[18:53:22] <travis-ci>
Railcraft/Railcraft#206 (mc-1.12.2 - 876c187 : CovertJaguar): The
build passed.
L52[18:53:22] <travis-ci> Change view :
https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/compare/e919b751fd28...876c18741680
L53[18:53:22] <travis-ci> Build details :
https://travis-ci.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/builds/96131289
L54[18:53:22] ⇦
Parts: travis-ci
(travis-ci!~travis-ci@ec2-54-159-124-167.compute-1.amazonaws.com)
())
L55[19:18:22] ⇨
Joins: travis-ci
(travis-ci!~travis-ci@ec2-54-80-227-188.compute-1.amazonaws.com)
L56[19:18:22] <travis-ci>
Railcraft/Railcraft#207 (mc-1.12.2 - cc07e4a : CovertJaguar): The
build passed.
L57[19:18:22] <travis-ci> Change view :
https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/compare/876c18741680...cc07e4abbe64
L58[19:18:22] <travis-ci> Build details :
https://travis-ci.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/builds/96133051
L59[19:18:22] ⇦
Parts: travis-ci
(travis-ci!~travis-ci@ec2-54-80-227-188.compute-1.amazonaws.com)
())
L60[19:24:07] <liach>
the simulation can support fast boats on ice, so i think fast
minecarts are possible
<liach>
the simulation can support fast boats on ice, so i think fast
minecarts are possibleL61[19:24:16] <fLAK>
how do the HS tracks go so fast if a design limitation prevents
reinforced tracks from going half their speeds?
<fLAK>
how do the HS tracks go so fast if a design limitation prevents
reinforced tracks from going half their speeds?L62[19:24:41] <fLAK>
less than half actaully
<fLAK>
less than half actaullyL63[19:24:59] <liach>
because hs tracks only go straight
<liach>
because hs tracks only go straightL64[19:25:25] <liach>
if hs track goes on corners, wo don't simulate but explode the
cart
<liach>
if hs track goes on corners, wo don't simulate but explode the
cartL65[19:26:03] <fLAK>
so if you didn't explode the cart then the game would crash or
something?
<fLAK>
so if you didn't explode the cart then the game would crash or
something?L66[19:27:01] <liach>
no, the cart will glitch off track
<liach>
no, the cart will glitch off trackL67[19:27:37] <fLAK>
so where's the limitation, is it the game's
tickrate?
<fLAK>
so where's the limitation, is it the game's
tickrate?L68[19:27:41] <liach>
sonetimes the carts even fail to explode; they just go straight
until hitting block
<liach>
sonetimes the carts even fail to explode; they just go straight
until hitting blockL69[19:28:19] <liach>
yes. if your speed is over 1block/tick the rail you pass might be
missed and fail to function
<liach>
yes. if your speed is over 1block/tick the rail you pass might be
missed and fail to functionL70[19:29:11] <fLAK>
is there anyway to raise the tickrate, and would it be practical to
do so?
<fLAK>
is there anyway to raise the tickrate, and would it be practical to
do so?L71[19:29:43] <liach>
lol no
<liach>
lol noL72[19:30:13] <liach>
many minecraft servers cannot even run at 20 tps
(ticks/second)
<liach>
many minecraft servers cannot even run at 20 tps
(ticks/second)L73[19:30:25] <fLAK>
I know that csgo servers are normally 128 tick (except for plebeian
valve servers) but I would assume there's much less going on
that needs to be processed
<fLAK>
I know that csgo servers are normally 128 tick (except for plebeian
valve servers) but I would assume there's much less going on
that needs to be processedL74[19:30:57] <fLAK>
and in that case the precision of a high tick rate is
possible
<fLAK>
and in that case the precision of a high tick rate is
possibleL75[19:31:21] <liach>
in fact, in newer versions, motion has been more reliable without
change in tickrate
<liach>
in fact, in newer versions, motion has been more reliable without
change in tickrateL76[19:31:29] <liach>
e.g. elytra ice boating
<liach>
e.g. elytra ice boatingL77[19:31:56] <liach>
elytra is so fast: it is faster than arrows or ender pearls!
<liach>
elytra is so fast: it is faster than arrows or ender pearls!L78[19:33:20] <CovertJaguar> elystra and boats
don't really need to inspect every block they travel
over
<CovertJaguar> elystra and boats
don't really need to inspect every block they travel
overL79[19:33:28] <CovertJaguar> minecart do
<CovertJaguar> minecart doL80[19:34:27] <CovertJaguar> a boat can skip several
blocks of ice and not care, but if a minecart skips several tracks,
well... it might no longer have any track under it
<CovertJaguar> a boat can skip several
blocks of ice and not care, but if a minecart skips several tracks,
well... it might no longer have any track under itL81[19:36:22] <liach>
@CovertJaguar apparently you cannot go through block corners with
boats, so i guess we may look at those code
<liach>
@CovertJaguar apparently you cannot go through block corners with
boats, so i guess we may look at those codeL82[19:36:42] <CovertJaguar> its not even over 1
block per tick, its over 0.5 blocks per tick that things start
falling apart, reinforced are set to 0.6, and they run inspection
on coming tracks to detect corners and slopes in order to slow down
to 0.4 in time to encounter them
<CovertJaguar> its not even over 1
block per tick, its over 0.5 blocks per tick that things start
falling apart, reinforced are set to 0.6, and they run inspection
on coming tracks to detect corners and slopes in order to slow down
to 0.4 in time to encounter themL83[19:38:02] <fLAK>
maybe you can group sets of rails together logically in their own
"chunks"
<fLAK>
maybe you can group sets of rails together logically in their own
"chunks"L84[19:38:02] <CovertJaguar> @liach the collision
algorithm is more forgiving, as it will move the boat back out of a
block collision until its no longer colliding or something like
that
<CovertJaguar> @liach the collision
algorithm is more forgiving, as it will move the boat back out of a
block collision until its no longer colliding or something like
thatL85[19:38:04] <fLAK>
umm
<fLAK>
ummL86[19:38:18] <fLAK>
idk how to explain this properly
<fLAK>
idk how to explain this properlyL87[19:39:18] <CovertJaguar> I might be able to push
the reinforced a little higher, but then you will find that locking
tracks and such become unreliable
<CovertJaguar> I might be able to push
the reinforced a little higher, but then you will find that locking
tracks and such become unreliableL88[19:39:35] <liach>
hmm, can we make air colliding blocks in a cart is on track
<liach>
hmm, can we make air colliding blocks in a cart is on trackL89[19:39:51] <CovertJaguar> I dont know what that
means
<CovertJaguar> I dont know what that
meansL90[19:41:45] <liach>
so that we can use forgiving collision logic
<liach>
so that we can use forgiving collision logicL91[19:43:41] <CovertJaguar> well part of the
problem is already that on up slopes the cart will collide with the
block under the track if its going to fast
<CovertJaguar> well part of the
problem is already that on up slopes the cart will collide with the
block under the track if its going to fastL92[19:44:01] <CovertJaguar> down slopes are pretty
safe, but not up slopes
<CovertJaguar> down slopes are pretty
safe, but not up slopesL93[19:45:23] <liach>
can't we add loops in the cart update code
<liach>
can't we add loops in the cart update codeL94[19:45:26] <fLAK>
or maybe you could make a rail line its own logical network, for
example all rails connected together form a "line", carts
on the line will know exactly where every turn and change in
elevation is and when in motion will perform the correct movements
without needing to perform constant block checks to find the next
rail
<fLAK>
or maybe you could make a rail line its own logical network, for
example all rails connected together form a "line", carts
on the line will know exactly where every turn and change in
elevation is and when in motion will perform the correct movements
without needing to perform constant block checks to find the next
railL95[19:45:31] <CovertJaguar> the only way to solve
this is to further expand the dynamic speed controller to slow down
on anything that isn't a simple straight piece of normal
track
<CovertJaguar> the only way to solve
this is to further expand the dynamic speed controller to slow down
on anything that isn't a simple straight piece of normal
trackL96[19:45:43] <liach>
so the velocity vector is split to unit vectors
<liach>
so the velocity vector is split to unit vectorsL97[19:46:03] <CovertJaguar> it _might_ be possible
to tick carts twice... but that a is a huge headache
<CovertJaguar> it _might_ be possible
to tick carts twice... but that a is a huge headacheL98[19:46:19] <CovertJaguar> it would help with a
lot of things like cart shuffling probably, but.... ugh
<CovertJaguar> it would help with a
lot of things like cart shuffling probably, but.... ughL99[19:47:03] <fLAK>
do I make any sense at all?
<fLAK>
do I make any sense at all?L100[19:47:09] <liach>
i don't mean to tick twice. i just want to handle velocity
more reliably, nothing else.
<liach>
i don't mean to tick twice. i just want to handle velocity
more reliably, nothing else.L101[19:47:52] <liach>
@fLAK the line calculation is a bit costly. if we can make that, we
have already made a omnipotent signal system
<liach>
@fLAK the line calculation is a bit costly. if we can make that, we
have already made a omnipotent signal systemL102[19:48:17] <CovertJaguar> @fLAK I understand what
you are saying, ie remove the simulation to be external to the
world and handle it all ourselves, that's been discussed with
regards to train derpyness, but again.... ugh lot of work and very
complex
<CovertJaguar> @fLAK I understand what
you are saying, ie remove the simulation to be external to the
world and handle it all ourselves, that's been discussed with
regards to train derpyness, but again.... ugh lot of work and very
complexL103[19:49:30] <CovertJaguar> carts don't have
"velocity" right now, they have momentum, from which
velocity is calculated
<CovertJaguar> carts don't have
"velocity" right now, they have momentum, from which
velocity is calculatedL104[19:50:31] <fLAK>
I mean you don't need for the "line" to poll
constantly for changes in the line, you could have any new track
piece added on to trigger an update to the layout or
something
<fLAK>
I mean you don't need for the "line" to poll
constantly for changes in the line, you could have any new track
piece added on to trigger an update to the layout or
somethingL105[19:51:13] <fLAK>
and when tracks break they cause a trigger to update the line
<fLAK>
and when tracks break they cause a trigger to update the lineL106[19:52:03] <CovertJaguar> yes, there are ways to
do it, its possible, but it almost needs to be its own thread and
then everything would have to be rewritten to support it and then
we have simulate so much of the current behiavor we currently get
from Minecraft and it just turns into a boondoggle
<CovertJaguar> yes, there are ways to
do it, its possible, but it almost needs to be its own thread and
then everything would have to be rewritten to support it and then
we have simulate so much of the current behiavor we currently get
from Minecraft and it just turns into a boondoggleL107[19:52:54] <CovertJaguar> that's the kind of
bottomless hole I could jump into for a year and still not quite
have it right at the end
<CovertJaguar> that's the kind of
bottomless hole I could jump into for a year and still not quite
have it right at the endL108[19:53:02] <liach>
don't all entities have motion?
<liach>
don't all entities have motion?L109[19:53:17] <CovertJaguar> I don't know much
about living entities
<CovertJaguar> I don't know much
about living entitiesL110[19:54:29] <fLAK>
imagine if we had this kind of system already in the vanilla game,
we could have multi-block turns and other cool shit
<fLAK>
imagine if we had this kind of system already in the vanilla game,
we could have multi-block turns and other cool shitL111[19:54:38] <CovertJaguar> probably yes
<CovertJaguar> probably yesL112[19:55:35] <fLAK>
like the high speed rails making large shallow curves around
obstacles
<fLAK>
like the high speed rails making large shallow curves around
obstaclesL113[19:55:40] <liach>
uh, not really. i don't want to make railcraft
immersiverailroading, a mod ij which every track block is a ticking
te
<liach>
uh, not really. i don't want to make railcraft
immersiverailroading, a mod ij which every track block is a ticking
teL114[19:56:11] <fLAK>
is that a thing?
<fLAK>
is that a thing?L115[19:56:38] <liach>
imo we can just add other flags to cart data to handle big
turns
<liach>
imo we can just add other flags to cart data to handle big
turnsL116[19:56:46] <CovertJaguar> well playing devils
advocate, you probably don't have to do it with a ticking TE,
just look at the Charge network and how it works
<CovertJaguar> well playing devils
advocate, you probably don't have to do it with a ticking TE,
just look at the Charge network and how it worksL117[19:58:11] <fLAK>
then again, these problems would all be avoided if MC ran at even a
slightly higher tick rate
<fLAK>
then again, these problems would all be avoided if MC ran at even a
slightly higher tick rateL118[19:58:31] <fLAK>
would even 64 or 32 tick/s make a difference?
<fLAK>
would even 64 or 32 tick/s make a difference?L119[19:58:45] <CovertJaguar> I'd love to have a
super reliable train physics simulator, but once you start getting
to that point, its probably almost easier to just write a new game
from scratch that already supports what you need
<CovertJaguar> I'd love to have a
super reliable train physics simulator, but once you start getting
to that point, its probably almost easier to just write a new game
from scratch that already supports what you needL120[19:59:08] <CovertJaguar> yeah, most games run at
a minimum of 60 ticks per second, it would make a huge
difference
<CovertJaguar> yeah, most games run at
a minimum of 60 ticks per second, it would make a huge
differenceL121[19:59:53] <CovertJaguar> but to achieve that,
Minecraft would have break everything it currently does in a tick
into different threads
<CovertJaguar> but to achieve that,
Minecraft would have break everything it currently does in a tick
into different threadsL122[20:00:15] <CovertJaguar> break it into smaller
chunks and run it in parallel
<CovertJaguar> break it into smaller
chunks and run it in parallelL123[20:00:33] <fLAK>
well hey, since microsoft seem content with breaking the game every
fucking patch, why the hell not lol
<fLAK>
well hey, since microsoft seem content with breaking the game every
fucking patch, why the hell not lolL124[20:01:07] <CovertJaguar> well they did move
chunk loading and world saving to its own thread thankfully, which
helped smooth the game out a lot
<CovertJaguar> well they did move
chunk loading and world saving to its own thread thankfully, which
helped smooth the game out a lotL125[20:01:33] <fLAK>
oh btw I see you implemented the laser rails I suggested like 7
years ago on the MC forums thread
<fLAK>
oh btw I see you implemented the laser rails I suggested like 7
years ago on the MC forums threadL126[20:01:39] <CovertJaguar> and each dimension now
operates in their own thread as well
<CovertJaguar> and each dimension now
operates in their own thread as wellL127[20:01:47] <fLAK>
thanks for that
<fLAK>
thanks for thatL128[20:01:59] <CovertJaguar> haha, yeah they've
been around for a couple years
<CovertJaguar> haha, yeah they've
been around for a couple yearsL129[20:02:26] <fLAK>
man I forgot I even suggested that until I saw them just now in
jei
<fLAK>
man I forgot I even suggested that until I saw them just now in
jeiL130[20:03:24] <liach>
we need a steam bridge!
<liach>
we need a steam bridge!L131[20:03:35] <fLAK>
I think my in-game name was Tr1gg3r_F1ng3r9 or Deathguise back
then
<fLAK>
I think my in-game name was Tr1gg3r_F1ng3r9 or Deathguise back
thenL132[20:03:51] <liach>
you promised it in forums (minecraftforum)
<liach>
you promised it in forums (minecraftforum)L133[20:04:12] <liach>
yeah, laser track was an advancement
<liach>
yeah, laser track was an advancementL134[20:04:26] <liach>
lol no, a patreon goal
<liach>
lol no, a patreon goalL135[20:04:46] <CovertJaguar> oh right, I forgot
about that
<CovertJaguar> oh right, I forgot
about thatL136[20:04:57] <CovertJaguar> its basically just a
reskin
<CovertJaguar> its basically just a
reskinL137[20:06:11] <liach>
i hope to see two or three housing (not head) signals like those
used by union pacific or bnsf
<liach>
i hope to see two or three housing (not head) signals like those
used by union pacific or bnsfL138[20:06:16] <CovertJaguar> the laser tracks were
on the minecraft forum "todo list" from nearly the
beginning
<CovertJaguar> the laser tracks were
on the minecraft forum "todo list" from nearly the
beginningL139[20:06:47] <liach>
they are in essence iron tracks
<liach>
they are in essence iron tracksL140[20:07:33] <CovertJaguar> I'll need a
picture to understand what you mean by houing
<CovertJaguar> I'll need a
picture to understand what you mean by houingL141[20:07:41] <CovertJaguar> I'll need a
picture to understand what you mean by housing [Edited]
<CovertJaguar> I'll need a
picture to understand what you mean by housing [Edited]L142[20:08:15] <CovertJaguar> speaking of which....
all the wayobject TESRs are broken, yay -.-
<CovertJaguar> speaking of which....
all the wayobject TESRs are broken, yay -.-L143[20:08:44] <CovertJaguar> probably some stupid on
line fix somewhere
<CovertJaguar> probably some stupid on
line fix somewhereL144[20:09:01] <CovertJaguar> probably some stupid
one line fix somewhere [Edited]
<CovertJaguar> probably some stupid
one line fix somewhere [Edited]L145[20:09:52]
⇨ Joins: SatanicSanta
(SatanicSanta!~SatanicSa@c-24-22-63-87.hsd1.or.comcast.net)
L146[20:10:01] <CovertJaguar> yep, the main reason I
can't even consider big projects like a sim rewrite is because
the rest of mod is currently held together with duck tape and
chewing gum xD
<CovertJaguar> yep, the main reason I
can't even consider big projects like a sim rewrite is because
the rest of mod is currently held together with duck tape and
chewing gum xDL147[20:13:19]
⇨ Joins: Meep
(Meep!uid44664@id-44664.charlton.irccloud.com)
L148[20:14:16] <Natesky9> And quickly running out of
duct tape
<Natesky9> And quickly running out of
duct tapeL149[20:15:29] <fLAK>
found a way into my forum account, fuck u twitch
<fLAK>
found a way into my forum account, fuck u twitchL150[20:15:37] <fLAK>
and found the post
<fLAK>
and found the postL151[20:15:38] <fLAK>
https://www.minecraftforum.net/forums/mapping-and-modding-java-edition/minecraft-mods/1277652-railcraft-9-2-2-0?page=21#c409
<fLAK>
https://www.minecraftforum.net/forums/mapping-and-modding-java-edition/minecraft-mods/1277652-railcraft-9-2-2-0?page=21#c409L152[20:17:49] <CovertJaguar> oh look, three posts
down my very first post about the entity dupe bug!
<CovertJaguar> oh look, three posts
down my very first post about the entity dupe bug!L153[20:18:13] <CovertJaguar> which might finally be
fixed now, seven years later xD
<CovertJaguar> which might finally be
fixed now, seven years later xDL154[20:18:22] <CovertJaguar> which might finally be
fixed now, eightyears later xD [Edited]
<CovertJaguar> which might finally be
fixed now, eightyears later xD [Edited]L155[20:18:22] <fLAK>
hahaha great
<fLAK>
hahaha greatL156[20:18:31] <CovertJaguar> which might finally be
fixed now, eight years later xD [Edited]
<CovertJaguar> which might finally be
fixed now, eight years later xD [Edited]L157[20:19:37] <fLAK>
huh, I forgot about the wooden and stone posts, what happened to
them?
<fLAK>
huh, I forgot about the wooden and stone posts, what happened to
them?L158[20:19:54] <liach>
aren't the basic posts back?
<liach>
aren't the basic posts back?L159[20:20:19] <CovertJaguar> I think the hold up was
not knowing how to handle the emblem post and not having a stone
post model
<CovertJaguar> I think the hold up was
not knowing how to handle the emblem post and not having a stone
post modelL160[20:20:30] <CovertJaguar> the painted metal posts
were restored
<CovertJaguar> the painted metal posts
were restoredL161[20:20:47] <liach>
the emblems can delay a bit
<liach>
the emblems can delay a bitL162[20:20:56] <CovertJaguar> they need to be
flattened is what needs to be done
<CovertJaguar> they need to be
flattened is what needs to be doneL163[20:21:18] <liach>
we can add models to emblems and load models with some client hooks
like that teisr
<liach>
we can add models to emblems and load models with some client hooks
like that teisrL164[20:21:57] <fLAK>
I see, oh and it turns out I wasnt the first to suggest the laser
rails, I apparently suggested the abandoned tracks and
droppers
<fLAK>
I see, oh and it turns out I wasnt the first to suggest the laser
rails, I apparently suggested the abandoned tracks and
droppersL165[20:22:25] ⇦
Quits: MCenderdragon (MCenderdragon!~MCenderdr@46.78.253.255)
(Quit: Leaving)
L166[20:22:26] <liach>
droppers?
<liach>
droppers?L167[20:22:38] <CovertJaguar> disposal tracks?
<CovertJaguar> disposal tracks?L168[20:22:42] <fLAK>
yeah that
<fLAK>
yeah thatL169[20:23:05] <fLAK>
*it's something*
<fLAK>
*it's something*L170[20:26:00] <liach>
i joined the rc team because i saw a reinforced track in some 1.4.7
ftb modpack and was immediately attracted to it. then i started
playing railcraft and now becomes a dev from a contributor and a
translator
<liach>
i joined the rc team because i saw a reinforced track in some 1.4.7
ftb modpack and was immediately attracted to it. then i started
playing railcraft and now becomes a dev from a contributor and a
translatorL171[20:26:27] <fLAK>
https://www.minecraftforum.net/forums/mapping-and-modding-java-edition/minecraft-mods/1277652-railcraft-9-2-2-0?page=22#c428
<fLAK>
https://www.minecraftforum.net/forums/mapping-and-modding-java-edition/minecraft-mods/1277652-railcraft-9-2-2-0?page=22#c428L172[20:29:11] <fLAK>
some things just sound better in my head...
<fLAK>
some things just sound better in my head...L173[20:33:21] <CovertJaguar> you have _no idea_ how
many people _begged_ me to let rails climb walls and run upside
down on ceilings, I eventually had to put up info notices saying
"no, this isn't happening"
<CovertJaguar> you have _no idea_ how
many people _begged_ me to let rails climb walls and run upside
down on ceilings, I eventually had to put up info notices saying
"no, this isn't happening"L174[20:37:52]
⇨ Joins: PitchBright
(PitchBright!~PitchBrig@toroon0628w-lp140-04-76-71-7-2.dsl.bell.ca)
L175[20:40:42]
⇨ Joins: travis-ci
(travis-ci!~travis-ci@ec2-54-226-112-178.compute-1.amazonaws.com)
L176[20:40:42] <travis-ci> Change view :
https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/compare/cc07e4abbe64...9932f4b4ea25
L177[20:40:42] <travis-ci>
Railcraft/Railcraft#208 (mc-1.12.2 - 9932f4b : CovertJaguar): The
build passed.
L178[20:40:42] <travis-ci> Build details :
https://travis-ci.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/builds/96137028
L179[20:40:42] ⇦
Parts: travis-ci
(travis-ci!~travis-ci@ec2-54-226-112-178.compute-1.amazonaws.com)
())
L180[20:40:43] <fLAK>
lol
<fLAK>
lolL181[20:41:37] ⇦
Quits: Vexatos
(Vexatos!~Vexatos@p200300C107205E55E4613D86E803FE4C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
(Quit: Insert quantum chemistry joke here)
L182[20:41:48] <fLAK>
oh do you remember the turntable suggestion?
<fLAK>
oh do you remember the turntable suggestion?L183[20:42:02] <fLAK>
https://www.minecraftforum.net/forums/mapping-and-modding-java-edition/minecraft-mods/1277652-railcraft-9-2-2-0?comment=422
<fLAK>
https://www.minecraftforum.net/forums/mapping-and-modding-java-edition/minecraft-mods/1277652-railcraft-9-2-2-0?comment=422L184[20:42:38] <fLAK>
I feel like that could be made into some overly complicated
multi-block just for the fuck of it
<fLAK>
I feel like that could be made into some overly complicated
multi-block just for the fuck of itL185[20:42:43] <liach>
@CovertJaguar for the running on ceilings, traincarts is actually
doing that
<liach>
@CovertJaguar for the running on ceilings, traincarts is actually
doing thatL186[20:43:46] <CovertJaguar> yeah, remember that,
its not super practical though, but I guess it could be
"done"
<CovertJaguar> yeah, remember that,
its not super practical though, but I guess it could be
"done"L187[20:46:41] <fLAK>
also that suggestion I made wasn't to have carts run upside
down, I was thinking more like, you know like in donkey kong
country where they had those rails hanging down from rods in the
ceiling and you rode in the cart upright.
<fLAK>
also that suggestion I made wasn't to have carts run upside
down, I was thinking more like, you know like in donkey kong
country where they had those rails hanging down from rods in the
ceiling and you rode in the cart upright.L188[20:47:03] <fLAK>
also that suggestion I made wasn't to have carts run upside
down, I was thinking more like in donkey kong country where they
had those rails hanging down from rods in the ceiling and you rode
in the cart upright. [Edited]
<fLAK>
also that suggestion I made wasn't to have carts run upside
down, I was thinking more like in donkey kong country where they
had those rails hanging down from rods in the ceiling and you rode
in the cart upright. [Edited]L189[23:27:39] ⇦
Quits: SatanicSanta
(SatanicSanta!~SatanicSa@c-24-22-63-87.hsd1.or.comcast.net) (Quit:
KVIrc 4.3.1 Aria http://www.kvirc.net/)