L3[04:24:05] <Resuz> @liach Awesome! I think it will look better if it will be more brighter

L4[04:24:30] <Resuz> red tracks are looks really dark

L5[04:47:12] <Resuz> Nah, seems only red looks too dark, others like yellow, orange, green are ?

L10[08:58:25] <liach> @Resuz in #showcase generalcamo improved the color

L13[11:30:57] <travis-ci> Railcraft/Railcraft#1114 (indev-1.12.2 - d9e34bc : Cody Brittain): The build passed.

L14[11:30:57] <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/compare/10ea232a8257...d9e34bcd24c8

L15[11:30:57] <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/Railcraft/Railcraft/builds/398842855

L21[13:32:04] <nuclearradar475> can you run railcraft 1.12.2 with other mods

L22[13:33:27] <Awf> I don't think there;s Railcraft for 1.12

L23[13:33:40] <Awf> but if it does come out, i dont' see why it cant run with other mods

L24[13:33:48] <bball.psd> $faq

L25[13:33:49] <Gearbot> Railcraft for 1.12 is **in progress**. A public build will come eventually!

L26[13:33:49] <Gearbot> You can build Railcraft from source but **cannot** build a jar file. This is intentional.

L27[13:33:49] <Gearbot> There are no builds for 1.8 or 1.9.

L28[13:34:11] <nuclearradar475> so you can just compile it into a Minecraft version

L29[13:35:40] <nuclearradar475> am I allowed to ask the expected release date

L30[13:37:00] <bball.psd> you're allowed to ask it, but we are not obliged to answer :P

L31[13:37:28] <nuclearradar475> so can you answer or is it private

L32[13:37:34] <Awf> lol

L33[13:37:42] <bball.psd> we don't have an expected release date

L34[13:37:50] <nuclearradar475> well ok thank you

L35[13:43:57] <Generalcamo> Also you can't compile it

L36[13:44:01] <Generalcamo> You can only run it

L39[14:12:05] <travis-ci> Railcraft/Railcraft#1115 (indev-1.12.2 - 818d267 : Cody Brittain): The build passed.

L40[14:12:05] <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/Railcraft/Railcraft/builds/398878707

L41[14:12:05] <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/compare/d9e34bcd24c8...818d267d491b

L46[14:48:41] <dustboy> can railcraft ores mines (is that what they're called?) be configured to only generate in specific biomes?

L48[14:50:55] <Generalcamo> They cannot

L52[16:10:24] <dustboy> the goal of railcraft oregen is to encourage players to build rail networks connecting their mines right? wouldn't biome specific ore placement help that even further? not asking for it to be implemented, it's just an idea

L53[16:24:56] <Chocohead> You'd have to find the biome before you could make a track to it, which could mean the track is prohibitively long

L54[16:46:08] <Generalcamo> The mines spawn so rarely anyway

L55[16:46:54] <Generalcamo> When you find one you are set for a very long time

L56[16:46:59] <Natesky9> unfortunately, there just isn't enough reason to make big railways :(

L57[16:47:21] <Natesky9> The excavator from IE is probably a better reason to expand

L58[16:47:24] <Generalcamo> Well actually they are the best method of power transmission....

L59[16:47:40] <Natesky9> how so?

L60[16:47:47] <Natesky9> are you talking the battery carts?

L61[16:47:49] <Generalcamo> Very little loss

L62[16:47:58] <Generalcamo> Replace your cables with them

L63[16:48:10] <Natesky9> You mean the shunting tracks?

L64[16:48:17] <Natesky9> I thought those were very lossy

L65[16:48:35] <dustboy> @Chocohead do you mean prohibitive as in time consuming to build or as in restricted by material cost?

L66[16:48:40] <Generalcamo> Shunting cable is very lossy. The electric track isn't

L67[16:49:05] <Natesky9> Erm, I thought they were changed. The electric tracks don't yield charge anymore

L68[16:49:27] <Generalcamo> Need to double check...

L69[16:49:53] <Natesky9> Even in the past, you couldn't recover charge after it was in tracks

L70[16:52:36] <liach> @Generalcamo Recently @Dockter contributed a fix that make mines more frequent, turns out there is some disparity between frequency of mines in dev env and production

L71[16:53:03] <Generalcamo> That was his AT changes?

L72[16:53:06] <liach> No

L73[16:54:18] <liach> It was some weird null check in predicate for ore spanwing

L74[16:54:20] <liach> spawning

L75[16:56:29] <dustboy> does railcraft include a method of "prospecting" for mines?

L76[16:57:11] <Generalcamo> Not _yet_

L77[16:57:17] <Generalcamo> It's planned

L78[16:57:39] <Generalcamo> Prospector Huts would spawn, and cartographers have maps you can buy to find them

L79[16:58:43] <liach> I've heard that cartographer maps do not yet work

L80[16:58:51] <liach> (for mods)

L81[16:59:19] <liach> World gen needs revamp too; there is a lot of cascading generation warnings now

L82[16:59:25] <liach> World gen needs revamp too; there are a lot of cascading generation warnings now [Edited]

L83[17:00:22] <dustboy> that sounds like a really interesting approach, can't wait to see it implemented. for now i'm using customoregen and prospects

L85[17:05:23] <Chocohead> I meant prohibitive in that depending how far you've gone to find a particular biome, it could be across an ocean or consume such a large amount of resources that there is little benefit to making it

L86[17:05:53] <Chocohead> Searching for the right biome alone could take a long time, at least once you've found it the track shouldn't take that long to lay

L87[17:07:45] <dustboy> i'm working on a modpack with custom biome placement similar to sevtech (temperature and humidity bands) which should make finding biomes easier. on top of that oceans are going to be smaller, because i want the focus to be on rails

L88[17:09:01] <dustboy> it's going to take a lot of tweaking for sure. i just wanted to know if railcraft could do it or not

L98[20:31:01] <travis-ci> Railcraft/Railcraft#1116 (indev-1.12.2 - 9669a01 : Cody Brittain): The build passed.

L99[20:31:01] <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/Railcraft/Railcraft/builds/398950276

L100[20:31:01] <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/compare/818d267d491b...9669a012f420