L23[12:51:35] <liach> https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft-API/commit/bd9722fe718b20c822337ce092d5a40fafc3f261

L24[12:51:59] <liach> main porting done, will push

L25[13:07:40] <vos6434> nice

L26[13:22:23] <liach> Yo guys! To all of those who try to port and make it compile, I did it already. https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/commit/b0fae9419e44ed9f58e5e69f8416038d61299732

L28[13:40:15] <travis-ci> Railcraft/Railcraft#962 (liach-1.12.2 - dc92675 : liach): The build passed.

L29[13:40:15] <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/compare/b0fae9419e44...dc92675412ad

L30[13:40:15] <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/Railcraft/Railcraft/builds/361774596

L31[13:42:47] <CovertJaguar> whats the status on the multi block PR?

L32[13:42:51] <CovertJaguar> is that ready?

L33[13:48:24] <liach> The current situation is that since I suck at rendering, I cannot fix all the multiblocks

L34[13:48:40] <liach> Anyways it is beneficial to split up since we will for sure split blocks up in 1.123

L35[13:48:42] <liach> 1.13

L36[13:50:54] <CovertJaguar> which ones still need work?

L37[13:51:08] <CovertJaguar> I was mostly asking if the issues with the PR have been resolved

L38[13:53:26] <liach> Here https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/issues/1373

L39[13:54:59] <CovertJaguar> what's the issue with the water tank?

L40[13:55:08] <CovertJaguar> its about the simplist multiblock there is

L41[14:09:36] <CovertJaguar> multiblock PR is ready for merge to main

L43[14:11:43] <travis-ci> Railcraft/Railcraft#965 (liach-1.10.2 - 4cfe762 : CovertJaguar): The build passed.

L44[14:11:43] <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/Railcraft/Railcraft/builds/361788810

L45[14:11:43] <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/compare/235d31c515fb...4cfe762f4365

L46[14:14:32] <CovertJaguar> merged

L48[14:17:19] <travis-ci> Railcraft/Railcraft#963 (liach-1.10.2 - 235d31c : CovertJaguar): The build has errored.

L49[14:17:19] <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/compare/5916dc2d5bd5...235d31c515fb

L50[14:17:19] <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/Railcraft/Railcraft/builds/361787539

L52[14:17:53] <travis-ci> Railcraft/Railcraft#967 (mc-1.10.2 - 188fec3 : CovertJaguar): The build passed.

L53[14:17:53] <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/compare/a6d446b5f117...188fec38670b

L54[14:17:53] <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/Railcraft/Railcraft/builds/361790796

L55[14:20:56] <liach> cj can you merge my api branch

L56[14:21:28] <CovertJaguar> I'll look at that next, trying to merge the Bore PR now

L58[14:23:12] <travis-ci> Railcraft/Railcraft#968 (fix/1335 - 417b6fe : CovertJaguar): The build is still failing.

L59[14:23:12] <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/compare/c9974cb90bb4...417b6feb48c0

L60[14:23:12] <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/Railcraft/Railcraft/builds/361794493

L61[14:27:05] <CovertJaguar> merged the saving PR and the liach-1.10.2 branch into mc-1.10.2

L62[14:30:44] <liach> cj, where can i push to if you dump my branch

L63[14:31:19] <liach> you know i cannot push to mc-1.10.2 and protected branches

L64[14:31:24] <CovertJaguar> uh...well I guess there is that

L65[14:31:56] <liach> that?

L67[14:32:06] <CovertJaguar> restored

L68[14:34:07] <CovertJaguar> lets see if it builds now

L70[14:36:31] <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/compare/417b6feb48c0...9be3a45f8099

L71[14:36:31] <travis-ci> Railcraft/Railcraft#971 (fix/1335 - 9be3a45 : CovertJaguar): The build is still failing.

L72[14:36:31] <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/Railcraft/Railcraft/builds/361800298

L74[14:45:18] <travis-ci> Railcraft/Railcraft#970 (mc-1.10.2 - 812492a : CovertJaguar): The build has errored.

L75[14:45:18] <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/Railcraft/Railcraft/builds/361800083

L76[14:45:18] <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/compare/188fec38670b...812492a14f69

L78[14:50:59] <travis-ci> Railcraft/Railcraft#973 (fix/1335 - aa3c897 : CovertJaguar): The build was fixed.

L79[14:50:59] <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/Railcraft/Railcraft/builds/361806240

L80[14:50:59] <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/compare/9be3a45f8099...aa3c89787d28

L81[14:55:45] <CovertJaguar> ok, the bore PR is merged

L85[15:00:39] <travis-ci> Railcraft/Railcraft#975 (mc-1.10.2 - a1df6c4 : CovertJaguar): The build has errored.

L86[15:00:39] <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/compare/812492a14f69...a1df6c4a783a

L87[15:00:39] <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/Railcraft/Railcraft/builds/361809048

L88[16:03:37] <liach> cj, we need to check block mining to some extent

L89[16:03:45] <liach> i mean multiblock mining

L90[16:03:59] <CovertJaguar> what do you mean?

L91[16:04:13] <CovertJaguar> make sure it drops the right block?

L92[16:04:25] <liach> yeah

L93[16:04:30] <CovertJaguar> k

L94[16:04:49] <liach> after that i think we'd get a beta to check bugs

L95[16:05:00] <CovertJaguar> sounds good

L96[16:21:18] <afdw> what imports order is used in Railcraft sources?

L97[16:25:12] <liach> import order? rc has a formatter

L98[16:25:26] <liach> java at last, alphabetical

L100[16:55:29] <afdw> thanks

L101[16:55:59] <afdw> formatter? This one? https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/blob/mc-1.10.2/extras/ide/settings/RailcraftCodeStyle.xml But it doesn't include import order settings for some reason

L103[18:48:01] <abculatter_2> How often do people actualit use wooden rails?

L104[18:48:09] <abculatter_2> How often do people actuallyuse wooden rails? [Edited]

L105[18:48:16] <abculatter_2> How often do people actually use wooden rails? [Edited]

L106[19:08:41] <abculatter_2> Also, I just had an idea for that mechanical chain-rail idea on the guthub issues, what about making the chain-rail a unique base track type, which provides a steady boost to all carts that are on top of it? These tracks would also automatically form a 'network' that contains all contiguous tracks of the same type, and this network would contain how many tracks are in itself, how much mechanical energy is being

L107[19:08:41] <abculatter_2> chain is going in, and maybe also the drag value of all carts currently being pushed by it.

L108[19:08:41] <abculatter_2> Mechanical energy would be a single 'torque' value, and would be put into the network by adjacent mechanical engine blocks. The number of tracks currently in the network would act as a kind of 'base' energy input that must be exceeded in order for the network to push anything. If cart drag value is also tracked by the network, that would be added to the track number for the duration that the cart is being pushe

L109[19:08:42] <abculatter_2> Also, I just had an idea for that mechanical chain-rail idea on the guthub issues, what about making the chain-rail a unique base track type, which provides a steady boost to all carts that are on top of it? These tracks would also automatically form a 'network' that contains all contiguous tracks of the same type, and this network would contain how many tracks are in itself, how much mechanical energy is being

L110[19:08:42] <abculatter_2> chain is going in, and maybe also the drag value of all carts currently being pushed by it.

L111[19:08:42] <abculatter_2> Mechanical energy would be a single 'torque' value, and would be put into the network by adjacent mechanical engine blocks. The number of tracks currently in the network would act as a kind of 'base' energy input that must be exceeded in order for the network to push anything. If cart drag value is also tracked by the network, that would be added to the track number for the duration that the cart is being pushe

L112[19:09:14] <abculatter_2> Also, I just had an idea for that mechanical chain-rail idea on the guthub issues, what about making the chain-rail a unique base track type, which provides a steady boost to all carts that are on top of it? These tracks would also automatically form a 'network' that contains all contiguous tracks of the same type, and this network would contain how many tracks are in itself, how much mechanical energy is being

L113[19:09:14] <abculatter_2> chain is going in, and maybe also the drag value of all carts currently being pushed by it.

L114[19:09:14] <abculatter_2> Mechanical energy would be a single 'torque' value, and would be put into the network by adjacent mechanical engine blocks. The number of tracks currently in the network would act as a kind of 'base' energy input that must be exceeded in order for the network to push anything. If cart drag value is also tracked by the network, that would be added to the track drag number for the duration that the cart is being

L115[19:11:40] <abculatter_2> A limitation of this track type could be either that it can't form corners/turns, or that it can't be made into intersections

L116[19:16:14] <abculatter_2> Mechanical engine blocks can be fed either a redstone signal, for weak but essentially free torque, or provided either steam or charge for full power.

L117[19:16:15] <abculatter_2> Could potentially make one engine for steam/redstone, and another for charge

L118[19:16:15] <abculatter_2> Mechanical engine blocks can be fed either a redstone signal, for weak but essentially free torque, or provided either steam or charge for full power.

L119[19:16:15] <abculatter_2> Could potentially make one engine for steam/redstone, and another for charge

L120[19:16:15] <abculatter_2> Mechanical engine blocks can be fed either a redstone signal, for weak but essentially free torque, or provided either steam or charge for full power.

L121[19:16:16] <abculatter_2> Mechanical engine blocks can be fed either a redstone signal, for weak but essentially free torque, or provided either steam or charge for full power.

L122[19:16:16] <abculatter_2> Mechanical engine blocks can be fed either a redstone signal, for weak but essentially free torque, or provided either steam or charge for full power.

L123[19:16:45] <abculatter_2> Could potentially make one engine for steam/redstone, and another for charge

L124[19:19:23] <Mimiru> ... that was... a thing on IRC lol

L125[19:19:42] <Mimiru> https://michi.pc-logix.com/hexchat_2018-04-03_19-19-38.png

L127[19:23:56] <abculatter_2> Oh, yeah, sorry... Discord does that when you have shitty internet reception

L128[19:28:00] <LizzyTheSiren> tbh i'm not even sure how discord fucks that up, because at least with the consumer API, you get a response back that your message was posted. it seems like the discord client wont wait for that to come back...

L129[19:28:55] <abculatter_2> Also, another addendum, ideally I feel like this would work best as a cheaper and simpler alternative to the other forms of moving carts around, which has some benefits of its own but mostly is just cheap. So making it use the wooden tracks as a base seems like a idea imo

L130[19:29:04] <abculatter_2> Also, another addendum, ideally I feel like this would work best as a cheaper and simpler alternative to the other forms of moving carts around, which has some benefits of its own but mostly is just cheap. So making it use the wooden tracks as a base seems like a good idea imo [Edited]

L131[19:48:31] <abculatter_2> Probably a good ballpark for iron/steel cost would be about the same or a bit cheaper per each then a standard track, and ideally would also come with its own iron-based holding track that provides no boost or direction, simply holds the cart above it when it doesn't get a redstone signal and does nothing if it does get a redstone signal

L134[20:12:28] <Natesky9> Wasn't there also a suggestion for a electric rail style of overhead rail?

L135[20:25:24] <liach> yeah, there was one by wooky

L143[20:48:30] <Natesky9> As much as I like the concept of different styles of rails, the problem still lies with practicality

L144[20:49:24] <Natesky9> Unless you have large farms scattered throughout the world, there's rarely any purpose for expansive rail networks

L145[20:49:43] <Natesky9> I've rarely even seen the force track emitter used practically

L146[21:54:50] <abculatter_2> Tbh, I agree with you on that, but almost everybody's too busy coming up with "IC2 but BETTAR" to actually try to explore actually interesting gameplay like that, soooo...

L147[21:55:59] <abculatter_2> Personally, when play with RC, I make up rules for my auto farms that force me to set up large rail networks

L148[21:56:12] <abculatter_2> Personally, when I play with RC, I make up rules for my auto farms that force me to set up large rail networks [Edited]

L149[21:57:23] <abculatter_2> Like, for example, wheat in plains, wood in woodlands, ores in extreme hills or mountains (with seperare 'veins' for each ore, if I can)

L151[22:21:07] <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/Railcraft/Railcraft/builds/361951330

L152[22:21:07] <travis-ci> Railcraft/Railcraft#977 (liach-1.12.2 - cd34ac7 : liach): The build passed.

L153[22:21:07] <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/compare/dc92675412ad...cd34ac709ad2

L157[23:15:11] <travis-ci> Railcraft/Railcraft#975 (mc-1.10.2 - a1df6c4 : CovertJaguar): The build passed.

L158[23:15:11] <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/Railcraft/Railcraft/builds/361809048

L159[23:15:11] <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft/compare/812492a14f69...a1df6c4a783a