L15[06:10:07] <Kodos> Damn, I'd have sworn I could use adv item unloaders to move stuff into the bottom port of an IE silo

L18[06:16:58] <Kodos> Okey doke, Storage Crates it is

L27[10:40:42] <mogazor> Hi, i was looking forward to using Railcraft's liquid steam boiler for producing steam, but I understand it's not available yet in MC 1.10 :\ I was wondering if anyone had alternate suggestions I can use in the meantime please?

L28[10:42:54] <Forecaster> I don't think there are any other mods than have an equivalent system

L29[10:43:41] <liach> rc is moving away from steam

L33[10:44:41] <mogazor> oh ?

L34[10:44:58] <mogazor> so the steam boiler isn't going to be reappear?

L35[10:45:09] <LuigiHutch> It is? I thought it was just moving away from rf?

L36[10:45:22] <Forecaster> what... no we're not

L37[10:45:38] <mogazor> phew!

L38[10:46:04] <mogazor> I guess that makes sense, since locomotives are steam powered ?

L41[10:48:00] <mogazor> Whilst I'm here, does anyone happen to know if there is an estimated timeline for when the steam boilers will be back please?

L42[10:48:11] <Forecaster> no, sorry

L43[10:48:18] <Michiyo> Right about when they're released.

L44[10:48:20] <mogazor> understood

L45[10:48:21] <Michiyo> Sorry...

L47[10:49:05] <mogazor> I'll need to do some research and find an alternate power source in the meantime, thanks anyway!

L48[10:49:24] <Forecaster> get an ic2 reactor running :P

L49[10:50:03] <mogazor> IC2 was cool, but I kinda went off it.

L50[10:50:31] <mogazor> I prefer to use renewable energy sources

L51[10:54:20] <liach> @mogazor 10.3.0

L52[10:54:37] <liach> The planned version

L53[10:54:53] <liach> contributions will make it faster

L54[10:56:22] <liach> also dependent on if we devs want to or have time to code

L55[10:57:18] <liach> I suggest ic2 wind turbines for clean energy

L57[10:59:04] <Michiyo> easiest idea, is to just create a microverse, make time inside it move faster than time outside it, wait til life evolves, go inside, give them the gift of power, but siphon off like 80% of that power and use it yourself..

L58[10:59:47] <Michiyo> then just stay really drunk like all the time, and go on adventures and stuff.

L59[11:00:01] <Michiyo> and hope they don't have the same idea.

L60[11:00:03] <LizzyTheSiren> Michiyo, what have i said about exposing our plans for world domination!? :P

L61[11:00:10] <Michiyo> Oh umm...

L62[11:00:11] <Michiyo> crap.

L63[11:07:50] <Forecaster> I wouldn't mind as long as they kept giving me 80% of the power they get from their miniverse

L64[11:12:20] <liach> /kill LizzyTheSiren

L65[11:12:36] <Forecaster> please stop doing that

L66[11:14:30] <LizzyTheSiren> That's not very nice, is it?

L67[11:14:43] <Kodos> Did you kill him back?

L68[11:15:45] <LizzyTheSiren> well, i mean he didn't manage to succeed

L69[11:40:17] <vigilian> Do we have an estimation of how much items is already accessible in the new version of railcraft from the old version?

L70[11:40:50] <Forecaster> the only major part that hasn't been ported yet is multiblocks I believe

L71[11:41:04] <vigilian> that's it you think?

L72[11:41:14] <vigilian> so tank and all tools which were in multiblocks then?

L73[11:41:25] <Forecaster> what?

L74[11:42:15] <vigilian> all the things that were using mutliblocks like steel tanks and steam turbine ?

L75[11:43:16] <Forecaster> what else would I be talking about?

L76[11:43:40] <vigilian> I don't knwo man!!! come one lol I was just asking for a clarification ^^

L77[11:43:51] <vigilian> okey so nearly done then

L79[11:47:22] <Forecaster> I wouldn't say that, the multiblocks make up a pretty large part of railcraft

L80[11:55:56] <vigilian> that's sad, I was trying to evaluate time before a possibility to have the 1.12

L81[12:00:54] <Forecaster> you're better off not doing that

L82[12:02:52] <LizzyTheSiren> Take the time you estimated then add another month to it for every question of "when 1.12 release?"

L83[12:03:10] <vigilian> oh come on guys

L84[12:03:18] <vigilian> don't be so harsh

L85[12:03:40] <vigilian> y ou know that's only because more and more mods are doing their transition to 1.12

L86[12:04:05] <vigilian> and they don't keep support for 1.10 progressively

L87[12:23:23] <LuigiHutch> People only have so much time. if CJ wants to work on 1.10, he can work on 1.10. Begging people into doing things you want doesn't help, it's more demotivating than anything

L89[12:23:43] <Janrupf> Hi

L90[12:24:29] <vigilian> Have I begged? don't think so. I was making an estimation on my own based on what it has previously been said on this particular chan about it

L91[12:26:32] <Janrupf> Hey, I need soe Help, os there a way to link a singalreciver and a motor-switch to one signal?

L92[12:27:48] <Forecaster> Janrupf no

L93[12:28:29] <Janrupf> Ok, thank you

L95[12:28:49] <Forecaster> you have to split using a receiver and two controllers

L96[12:29:56] <Janrupf> I trying to make a computercraft controller, so it needs feedback if there is a train on the track. I going to try this ;)

L97[12:30:24] <Forecaster> Janrupf get computronics

L98[12:30:37] <Forecaster> it has a digital receiver you can use

L99[12:30:50] <Forecaster> I think it's compatible with computercraft

L100[12:31:27] <Janrupf> Hmm, how could it help me?

L101[12:31:53] <Forecaster> you can read it directly with the computer instead of doing it with redstone

L102[12:32:00] <Forecaster> and it can connect to multiple sources

L103[12:32:06] <Forecaster> up to 30 or something I think

L104[12:32:07] <Janrupf> well, thats nice

L105[12:32:57] <Janrupf> now im going to rewrite 3 hours of work xD (lua scripting and project red cabel placing)

L106[12:37:19] <liach> @vigilian If I have time I can move the mod to 1.12 in one day, but I don't have time

L107[12:37:49] <liach> We are fixing multiblocks first

L108[12:39:19] <vigilian> no problem liach as I said it was just an estimation nad before it has been said that railcraft has to be finished or nearly finished first then moving to another version. (Yes before asking quesiton I do search) So don't worry it was not begging just wondering about how much items were lacking from the actual alpuha version of railcraft. But thanks for the clarificaiton anyway ?

L109[12:39:26] <vigilian> @liach

L112[12:41:40] <CovertJaguar> I want to get the posts done before september, then we can push out 10.2.0. If I have time after that I'll see about pushing a build for 1.11

L113[12:41:59] <CovertJaguar> anyway, that's the current plan

L114[12:42:13] <CovertJaguar> 1.12 will come at some point after that

L115[12:44:18] <vigilian> no prob CJ ? and again thanks for the clarification ? I just don't like being taken for an idiot or that people are being harsh about something that they actually over-interprated. Take all the time you need anyway, it's your mod. I just have to manage problem of logistics here.

L117[12:44:47] <Forecaster> oh yeah, posts

L118[12:45:11] <vigilian> and by the way i totally understand that these kind of questions can be ... problematic.

L119[12:45:52] <CovertJaguar> I will admit that between various other irl things, posts being a pain, and once again taking on too much at once, I've been slacking a bit lately =P

L120[12:46:19] <SkySom> It happens. Too much BS with porting

L121[12:46:59] <Kodos> Man, it's too bad there isn't a stable version that mods could've stayed on... Oh wait ;-D

L122[12:47:29] <Forecaster> yeah, like 1.8

L123[12:47:32] <Forecaster> :D

L125[12:55:46] <Kodos> lol

L126[12:56:19] <SkySom> I was fine with updating passed 1.7.10, a Port everyone and awhile isn't awful

L127[12:56:54] <SkySom> It was the relatively rapid 1.8 -> 1.8.9 -> 1.9/1.10 -> 1.11 -> 1.12 that was awful

L128[12:57:43] <Kodos> I honestly wonder if the rapidfire version changes was what drove Emoniph away

L129[13:01:55] <Forecaster> ?

L130[13:02:02] <Forecaster> I'm fine with 1.10 for now

L131[13:34:20] <Janrupf> Ok, I need agian some help, does anyone know how to use the digital signal controller / reciver from computronics (using Computercraft and I know how warpping and so on works, I just need the methods and an explanation)

L133[13:37:12] <Vexatos> D:

L134[13:37:23] <Vexatos> uuh

L135[13:37:38] <Vexatos> Janrupf, I'd say "read the manual" but that's only available from OpenComputers, so, uuuh

L136[13:37:39] <Vexatos> uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh

L137[13:37:49] <Janrupf> ehhhm, lol

L138[13:38:10] <Vexatos> documentation is https://github.com/asiekierka/Computronics/tree/master/src/main/resources/assets/computronics/doc/opencomputers/computronics/en_US/block/railcraft

L139[13:38:40] <Janrupf> ohhh, i looked at the old wiki xD

L140[13:38:43] <Vexatos> You pair the box like normal, then you use these methods https://github.com/asiekierka/Computronics/blob/master/src/main/java/pl/asie/computronics/integration/railcraft/tile/TileDigitalReceiverBox.java#L257

L141[13:39:01] <Vexatos> On the receiver

L142[13:39:05] <Vexatos> and these on the controller https://github.com/asiekierka/Computronics/blob/master/src/main/java/pl/asie/computronics/integration/railcraft/tile/TileDigitalControllerBox.java#L220

L143[13:39:26] <Michiyo> lol...

L144[13:39:34] <Vexatos> if you scroll a bit up in the code, you can see the OpenComputers definitions of them, those also show the proper function documentation :I

L145[13:39:55] <Vexatos> the ComputerCraft functions work exactly the same as their OC counterparts

L146[13:40:01] <Vexatos> so you can just read that instead ._.

L147[13:41:23] <Vexatos> if you want to set or get the aspect of a specific paired box, you need to refer to it by name

L148[13:41:38] <Vexatos> "name" being the name you give it using a signal label

L149[13:41:55] <Vexatos> (which, by the way, was added mostly for this feature :D)

L150[13:42:12] <Forecaster> by mostly you mean entierly :P

L151[13:42:20] <Vexatos> pretty much, yeah

L152[13:42:50] <Vexatos> ComputerCraft has no good way of doing in-game documentation which makes this stuff really annoying

L153[13:43:28] <Vexatos> Janrupf, if you have any more or more specific questions, just ask :I

L154[13:43:36] <Vexatos> I'm the guy who made them :I

L155[13:45:16] <Janrupf> I'll do :D

L156[13:52:14] <Janrupf> Ehhm, Im not able to wrap these as normal devices

L157[13:53:37] <Janrupf> ehhm, lol, sry

L158[13:53:44] <Janrupf> my failure

L177[19:02:20] <Natesky9> oops.irl http://tinyurl.com/ybm48nkn