<<Prev Next>> Scroll to Bottom
Stuff goes here
L1[00:23:11] ⇦
Quits: scj643 (scj643!~quassel@scj.theender.net) (Quit:
Bye)
L2[00:23:25] ⇨
Joins: scj643 (scj643!~quassel@scj.theender.net)
L3[00:51:23] ⇨
Joins: Doty1154
(Doty1154!~Doty1154@c-73-189-164-179.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
L4[01:32:52]
<Kodos> This
is a test message. Ignore this message.
L5[01:33:39] ⇦
Quits: Doty1154
(Doty1154!~Doty1154@c-73-189-164-179.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) (Read
error: Connection reset by peer)
L6[01:55:51] <Guest13> First time in the end
today. How do I escape outer island? Have to build a bridge to the
inner island?
L7[03:13:16]
<Forecaster>
same way you got there?
L8[03:32:08] ⇦
Quits: minecreatr (minecreatr!~minecreat@tterrag.com) (Ping
timeout: 182 seconds)
L9[03:34:18] ⇨
Joins: minecreatr (minecreatr!~minecreat@tterrag.com)
L10[04:20:39] ⇦
Quits: cloakable
(cloakable!~cloakable@cpc87175-aztw31-2-0-cust202.18-1.cable.virginm.net)
(Ping timeout: 198 seconds)
L11[04:22:15]
<Forecaster>
huh
L13[04:22:27]
<Forecaster>
something's happened to ConEmu...
L14[04:22:43]
<Forecaster>
it's not rendering any text anymore...
L15[04:46:58] ⇨
Joins: cloakable
(cloakable!~cloakable@cpc87175-aztw31-2-0-cust202.18-1.cable.virginm.net)
L16[05:10:11] ⇨
Joins: jazzpi (jazzpi!~jazzpi@jazzpis.space)
L17[05:28:26] ⇨
Joins: Inari
(Inari!~Pinkishu@p5dec62f1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
L18[05:28:32] <Inari> %inv add Extra Magic
Hour
L19[05:28:33] *
MichiBot summons 'Extra Magic Hour' and adds to her inventory. I
could get some good swings in with this.
L20[05:28:44] <Inari> %tell AmandaC hehe,
it's beyond adoarble :D
L21[05:28:44] <MichiBot> Inari: AmandaC
will be notified of this message when next seen.
L22[05:31:24] <Inari> %tell AmandaC I might
have quoted that before, but from a review: the animators had also
used graphics, effects, and the hearts and souls of those who love
cute things too not only woo their viewers into a zombie like state
in which people will stare adoringly at their computer screen, but
also a near death experience where the viewer’s soul have somehow
died and gone to a world of pure bliss.
L23[05:31:25] <MichiBot> Inari: AmandaC
will be notified of this message when next seen.
L24[05:31:44]
<Forecaster>
yay reboot fixed it
L25[05:32:08] <Inari> Yay IT problme fix
101
L26[05:32:12] <Inari> Good thing we don't
need to reboot people
L27[05:32:33]
<Forecaster>
I hate rebooting though because it takes time :|
L28[05:32:45] <Inari> %tell AmandaC Also
still loving Extra Magic Hour( Amagi Park's OP song I think) :P
Makes me tear up, esp. with the lyrics
L29[05:32:46] <MichiBot> Inari: AmandaC
will be notified of this message when next seen.
L30[05:33:00] <Inari> I mostly hate
rebooting because I haveto open all the stuff again that I had open
before :P
L31[05:33:43]
<Forecaster>
my browsers auto-start, windows keeps folders on it's own
L32[05:33:57]
<Forecaster>
that's all I have perma-open
L34[05:35:26] ⇦
Quits: Dimtree
(Dimtree!~dimtree@75-108-77-138.nbrncmtk01.res.dyn.suddenlink.net)
(Ping timeout: 194 seconds)
L35[05:39:15] ⇨
Joins: Dimtree
(Dimtree!~dimtree@75-108-77-138.nbrncmtk01.res.dyn.suddenlink.net)
L36[05:42:39] ⇦
Quits: Dimtree
(Dimtree!~dimtree@75-108-77-138.nbrncmtk01.res.dyn.suddenlink.net)
(Quit: Peace)
L37[05:47:43] ⇦
Quits: cloakable
(cloakable!~cloakable@cpc87175-aztw31-2-0-cust202.18-1.cable.virginm.net)
(Ping timeout: 198 seconds)
L38[05:57:05] ⇨
Joins: TheGin (TheGin!webchat@105.136.37.75)
L39[05:57:30] <TheGin> Oye ! Is there a way
to parse a json string to a table please?
L40[06:00:35] <Izaya> Sure :D
L41[06:00:38] <Izaya> Write a JSON
parser.
L42[06:01:28] <fingercomp> or find a JSON
parser and use it
L43[06:03:39] ⇦
Quits: TheGin (TheGin!webchat@105.136.37.75) (Quit:
webchat.esper.net)
L44[06:04:18] ⇨
Joins: Dimtree
(Dimtree!~dimtree@75-108-77-138.nbrncmtk01.res.dyn.suddenlink.net)
L45[06:07:41] <AmandaC> %tell Inari you
don't need to use %tell for me :p
L46[06:07:44] <MichiBot> AmandaC: Inari
will be notified of this message when next seen.
L47[06:08:41] <AmandaC> Or was the vengence
for my %tell storm the other night
L48[06:29:44] <Inari> AmandaC: :P
L49[06:47:27] ⇨
Joins: cloakable
(cloakable!~cloakable@cpc87175-aztw31-2-0-cust202.18-1.cable.virginm.net)
L51[06:49:57] <AmandaC> Hopefully that link
works for you, I had a hard time finding one with the audio and the
OP video
L52[06:52:55] <AmandaC> ( The video
complimenets the song very well, imho )
L53[07:02:15] <Inari> Haha yeah, a proper
version of Extra Magic hour is hard to find on YT too
L54[07:02:17] <Inari> They're all sped up
or such
L55[07:03:38] <Inari> AmandaC: Seems like a
nice OP
L56[07:04:15] <Inari> Wotakoi's OP also has
a great part haha
L58[07:04:48] <MichiBot>
Wotaku ni Koi
wa Muzukashii op but only the best part | length:
22s |
Likes:
2,475 Dislikes:
14 Views:
85,657 | by
FazexWeeb |
Published On 19/4/2018
L59[07:06:03] <AmandaC> hehe
L60[07:08:10]
<Inari> Mhmm
cardboard soup
L62[07:12:05] <AmandaC> O.o
L64[07:18:41] <MichiBot>
アマゾンのダンボールで包丁作り。煮たり、焼いたり、叩いたりして研ぐ | length:
11m 48s |
Likes:
3,739 Dislikes:
62 Views:
30,240 | by
圧倒的不審者の極み! |
Published On 18/6/2018
L66[07:23:35] <MichiBot>
Lucky Star -
Sky High | length:
1m 14s | Likes:
716 Dislikes:
9
Views:
64,281 | by
Ryan Denief | Published On
16/1/2009
L68[07:23:40] <Inari> Damn, wrong
link
L70[07:24:03] <MichiBot>
Megassa
Senshinkoku Tsuruya-san 【Haruhi × Kirby's Sand Canyon】 |
length:
37s | Likes:
243
Dislikes:
2 Views:
26,511 |
by
reddevils500a | Published On 26/1/2009
L71[07:37:35] <AmandaC> Inari: what weird
videos...
L72[07:37:36] ⇨
Joins: CrimsonCrayon
(CrimsonCrayon!~crimsoncr@23-112-153-150.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net)
L73[07:37:52] <CrimsonCrayon> Hello
L74[07:40:13] <AmandaC> Hello
L75[07:41:11]
<Forecaster>
%hello
L76[07:41:11] <MichiBot> Forecaster: Hello!
Welcome to #oc! The one and only opencomputers channel! Please ask
your questions directly (dont ask to ask) and provide error/code
examples! (Use pastebin.com if theyre more than one line!) Dont
mind the random conversation you might have walked into.
L77[07:42:00] <CrimsonCrayon> I haven't
played with OC in a long time..I dont remember the IRC client
L78[07:43:23]
<Forecaster>
you were the irc client all along!
L79[07:43:45] <CrimsonCrayon> lol
L80[08:01:48] <Inari> AmandaC: Are they?
:D
L81[08:01:59] <Inari> Could listen to
Megassa Canyon all day long xD
L82[08:02:53] ⇨
Joins: Thutmose
(Thutmose!~Patrick@host-69-59-79-181.nctv.com)
L83[08:31:33] ⇦
Quits: Thutmose (Thutmose!~Patrick@host-69-59-79-181.nctv.com)
(Quit: Leaving.)
L84[08:40:39] ⇨
Joins: smoke_fumus
(smoke_fumus!~smoke_fum@188.35.176.90)
L85[09:05:54] ⇦
Quits: CrimsonCrayon
(CrimsonCrayon!~crimsoncr@23-112-153-150.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net)
(Quit: CrimsonCrayon)
L86[09:07:10] ⇦
Quits: cloakable
(cloakable!~cloakable@cpc87175-aztw31-2-0-cust202.18-1.cable.virginm.net)
(Ping timeout: 182 seconds)
L87[09:09:49] ⇨
Joins: cloakable
(cloakable!~cloakable@cpc87175-aztw31-2-0-cust202.18-1.cable.virginm.net)
L88[09:23:46] ⇨
Joins: Guest13_
(Guest13_!~sh@shpd-178-69-162-179.vologda.ru)
L89[09:26:24] ⇦
Quits: Guest13 (Guest13!~sh@shpd-178-69-247-7.vologda.ru) (Ping
timeout: 194 seconds)
L90[09:33:29] ⇨
Joins: Vexatos
(Vexatos!~Vexatos@p200300C1071794599C83B8E9435C1962.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
L91[09:33:29] zsh
sets mode: +v on Vexatos
L92[09:34:46]
<Wuerfel_21>
Did anyone write an OC web browser yet?
L93[09:36:47] <Skye> I think Izaya
did?
L94[09:36:55] <Izaya> I swear I didn' -
oh
L95[09:37:06] <Izaya> yeah uh it's
currently being rewritten to do hypertext
L96[09:57:37] ⇨
Joins: dd (dd!~dd@188.18.64.131)
L97[09:57:55] ⇦
Quits: dd (dd!~dd@188.18.64.131) (Client Quit)
L98[09:59:28] <Izaya> hey does anyone want
to test whether OpenOS supports the 'clear to end of screen' escape
code?
L99[10:10:15] ⇦
Quits: Orbstheorem
(Orbstheorem!~Orbstheor@hellendaal.orbstheorem.ch) (Ping timeout:
202 seconds)
L100[10:10:32]
⇨ Joins: Orbstheorem
(Orbstheorem!~Orbstheor@hellendaal.orbstheorem.ch)
L102[10:56:37] <Skye> Izaya, wouldn't you
ask payonel? :P
L103[11:18:51] <S3> So i got my timers
working !
L104[11:19:20] <S3> The more processes
with events waiting to be processed the more inaccurate it gets cut
i couldn't show it down
L106[11:39:41]
⇨ Joins: Thutmose
(Thutmose!~Patrick@host-69-59-79-181.nctv.com)
L107[12:28:08]
⇨ Joins: fwe (fwe!~fwe@185.175.128.11)
L108[12:28:58] ⇦
Quits: fwe (fwe!~fwe@185.175.128.11) (Client Quit)
L109[12:47:48] ⇦
Quits: pwootage (pwootage!~pwootage@new.pwootage.com) (Quit:
Cya)
L110[12:48:56]
⇨ Joins: pwootage
(pwootage!~pwootage@new.pwootage.com)
L111[13:27:48]
⇨ Joins: Cervator
(Cervator!~Thunderbi@2601:4c1:4001:1d5d:2004:312d:f67d:326a)
L112[13:43:15]
⇨ Joins: Skiuileuf
(Skiuileuf!webchat@109.97.174.170)
L113[13:43:19] <Skiuileuf> Hello
L114[13:44:01] <Skiuileuf> Can I test my
IRC client on this server?
L115[13:46:35] <payonel> Guest13_: what's
the value in removing the table-access of component.list() in the
fs code?
L116[13:48:08] <payonel> @Wuerfel_21
openos running on low memory has been my mission in life for last
few years
L117[13:48:40]
<Wuerfel_21>
it appears to run fine enough on 192k
L118[13:49:07]
<Wuerfel_21>
while i heard mineos has problems on 2048k
L119[13:49:12]
<Wuerfel_21>
these days
L120[13:49:17] <payonel> @Wuerfel_21 yeah,
just be careful with some loading behavior :)
L121[13:49:31] <payonel> like, tab
complete, and non-simple command text
L122[13:49:46] <payonel> and edit is
definitely out of the question :)
L123[13:50:21] <payonel> Izaya: yes,
openos vt100 has "clear" support
L124[13:50:26] <payonel> in various
forms
L125[13:50:34] <payonel> maybe i'll make a
wiki page with the supported vt100 codes
L126[13:50:37] <payonel> another tie
L127[13:50:39] <payonel> time*
L128[13:51:06]
<Wuerfel_21>
then agian, if one can afford 192k, 384k isn't much more
expensive
L129[13:51:28]
⇨ Joins: Heisenborg
(Heisenborg!~Heisenbor@93.170.76.26)
L130[13:52:18] ⇦
Quits: Heisenborg (Heisenborg!~Heisenbor@93.170.76.26) (Client
Quit)
L131[13:52:37] <payonel> @wuerfel_21 well,
i dont see the point of t1, just use t1.5 if you must
L132[13:52:45] <payonel> that's a huge dif
(at that level)
L133[13:53:04]
<Wuerfel_21>
yep
L134[13:53:48]
<Wuerfel_21>
on my new server that i may or may not be working on, i'm thinking
of just moving the RAM tiers down a notch
L135[13:54:54]
<Wuerfel_21>
and make t3.5 1536k
L136[13:55:18] <Guest13_> payonel, it's
for OC memory-efficiency & cpu-efficiency. It's not like a big
boost though, but apparently just noone uses table syntax
L137[13:55:28] ⇦
Quits: Skiuileuf (Skiuileuf!webchat@109.97.174.170) (Quit:
webchat.esper.net)
L138[13:55:46] <AmandaC> payonel: btw, if
you'd ever like some help with figuring out a ldoc workflow for
openos at some point, feel free to hit me up. I've made a few
ddifferent ldoc sets for existing shit, and made a tool to turn it
into Dash/Zeal docsets
L139[13:55:55] <Guest13_> Sometimes when I
type 'components' too fast after the boot, I get memory overflow on
512kb machine
L140[13:57:00] <Guest13_> /bin/component
implementation probably sucks, but the table will still be there in
memory anyway
L141[13:57:39] <Guest13_> And for my own
purpose, vcomponent wouldn't require to copy data into separate
table; just an iterator would be enough
L143[14:00:40] <Guest13_> payonel, to
clarify a little bit, I'm not exactly for disabling table-index
access in component.list(). I'm for making it undocumented, and
unrequired in mocking implementations
L144[14:01:09] <AmandaC> I've also got a
pico-8 docset that I havn't uploaded anywhere, I don't think.
L145[14:01:23] <LeshaInc> payonel: cannot
comment on the issue #2866 (the latest one), but it seems that
preparePowerUp function is not calling in the wake-up message
handler
L146[14:01:26] <Guest13_> One can always
postpone optimizing of component.list() actual java implementation
for later; but specs has to be done right from the beginning
L147[14:01:55] <LeshaInc> payonel: it was
me who reported, and fingercomp who discovered what was going on,
though i don't know why didn't he write about this function in the
issue
L149[14:04:36] <LeshaInc> if you start
drone by hand, this function is calling and everything is ok
L150[14:08:55] <Guest13_> payonel, 7kb for
component.list() table on a tablet. I'm afraid to imagine how much
would it take on a server with a ton of components
L151[14:10:07]
<Alex404>
question: maybe it exist and I'm the only one that don't know how
to do it but... can I write a book with opencomputers?
L152[14:14:21] ⇦
Quits: Renari (Renari!~Renari@75.97.175.72.res-cmts.bgr.ptd.net)
(Ping timeout: 194 seconds)
L153[14:16:01] <payonel> LeshaInc: great
find. i think you're right. why not comment on the ticket with
that?
L154[14:16:35] <payonel> Guest13_: you're
saying my fs code causes /bin/component to crash if done quickly
after boot because my use of index the result?
L155[14:17:15] <LeshaInc> payonel:
actually i cannot do that
L156[14:17:20] <payonel> why?
L157[14:17:25] <payonel> are you blocked?
:|
L158[14:17:36] <Guest13_> payonel,
no
L159[14:17:59] <LeshaInc> payonel: deleted
my github account because of micro$oft, moving to gitlab
L160[14:18:04] <Guest13_> payonel, it's
the component.list() that eats it. /lib/filesystem just uses that
feature unnecessarily
L161[14:18:10] <payonel> LeshaInc:
:/
L162[14:18:17] <LeshaInc> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
L163[14:18:40] <payonel> overreaction a
bit :) but, obviously this is subjective
L164[14:19:13] <payonel> Guest13_: it
saves me memory, so i used it
L165[14:19:21] <payonel> Guest13_: i'm
just not seeing the benefit of not using it
L166[14:19:30] <Guest13_> payonel, so if
we fix /lib/filesystem to just use component.type() call instead,
we can pretend that this feature is not present, and can be
optimized some day. and vcomponent won't require to implement it
too
L167[14:19:44] <Guest13_> payonel, how
does it save you memory?
L168[14:19:49] <payonel> less code
L169[14:20:09] <Guest13_> it adds 7kb on
memory footprint tho
L170[14:20:13] <payonel> i can simplify
the code by checking if the type was explicit
L171[14:21:04] <Guest13_> i think, `if not
component.list("filesystem")[filter]...` is not much
shorter than `if not
component.type(filter)=="filesystem"` if not longer
L172[14:21:40] <Guest13_> the former might
be a little bit clear in behavior with 'nil', but they are
completely the same as far as I see
L173[14:22:44] <Guest13_> and the latter
doesn't theoretically require the api to instantiate a table
L174[14:22:54] <AmandaC> %choose watch
more zombie, or start other new anime
L175[14:22:54] <MichiBot> AmandaC: start
other new anime
L176[14:22:58] *
AmandaC nods
L177[14:23:20] <Guest13_> which might be a
big deal for systems with lots of components
L178[14:23:27] <Guest13_> or with low
memory
L179[14:24:28] <Guest13_> `if
component.type(filter)~="filesystem"` is, in fact,
shorter
L180[14:25:37] <payonel> it's not number
of chars
L181[14:26:01] <Guest13_> what it is
then?
L182[14:26:21] <Guest13_> the
bytecode?
L183[14:27:04] <AmandaC> The use of memory
on the OC system with the code in use
L184[14:27:30] <Guest13_> AmandaC, my
point is that the latter is more efficient
L185[14:27:44] <AmandaC> Which is not
going to be affected by syntax changes by a large margin
L186[14:28:48] <payonel> Guest13_: using
type(filter) ~= "filesystem" results in the same bytecode
size
L187[14:28:55] <Guest13_> great
L188[14:29:13] <Guest13_> could you please
do it? :)
L189[14:29:15] <AmandaC> The filesystem
already has to use the component system, and doubt there's a
trivial amount of other parts of openos that uses that
feature
L190[14:29:29] <payonel> it's just this
one place i use it like this
L191[14:29:32] <payonel> AmandaC
L192[14:29:36] <Guest13_> payonel,
exactly
L193[14:29:37] <AmandaC> Ah
L194[14:30:03] <AmandaC> Back to anime u
guess
L195[14:30:04] <Guest13_> and it's not the
thing I really want. It's the requirement for the thing I really
want.
L196[14:30:09] <AmandaC> I*
L197[14:30:10] <payonel> though i dont see
why Guest13_ is so concerned. if you are creating 7kb tables for
the result, i think you're doing it wrong
L198[14:30:14] *
Inari feeds AmandaC some cheese risotto
L199[14:30:22] <payonel> Guest13_: well
that isn't going to change :/
L200[14:30:31] <Guest13_> I want the docs
to stop referring to component.list() as a table, and refer to it
as an iterator, like it was a few days ago
L201[14:30:45] <payonel> well the docs
were wrong :(
L202[14:31:06] <Guest13_> docs were not
wrong. they were less specific
L203[14:31:22] <payonel> incomplete
:P
L204[14:31:32] <Guest13_> less specific
:)
L205[14:31:39] <Guest13_> that's
different
L206[14:32:11] <Guest13_> ok it's actually
for the devs (i.e. you) to decide, if they were wrong or less
specific. I'm just trying to convince you that the latter is a
bigger good in perspective
L207[14:33:40] <payonel> Guest13_: we
prefer basic values in returns. the iterator behavior of the
component.list() result is the extra
L208[14:33:45] <payonel> not the
basic
L209[14:34:04] <Guest13_> payonel,
"if you are creating 7kb tables for the result, i think you're
doing it wrong" it's you who does that
L210[14:34:28] <payonel> Guest13_: there
is no measurable difference using the table vs the iterator in
runtime cost
L211[14:34:36] <payonel> so i'm not sure
how you're measuring that 7kb
L212[14:35:07] <Guest13_>
c=require('computer'); cc=require('component');
print(c.freeMemory()); t=cc.list(); print(c.freeMemory())
L213[14:35:24] <payonel> that, perhaps,
before gc
L214[14:35:33] <Guest13_> true tho
L215[14:35:45] <payonel> though i'd be
surprised if it needed all 7kb for that table
L216[14:35:57] <payonel> i have a lot of
memory profiling experience with lua
L217[14:36:25] <payonel> i would expect
something closer to 2 or 3 kb
L218[14:37:58] <Guest13_> how can I
measure it more precisely?
L219[14:38:14] <Guest13_> it's not like
2-3kb vs 7kb is a big difference for me though
L220[14:39:53] <payonel> i have profilers
than can give you more exact allocations and stack traces, but what
you would find is that it may allocate 7kb, but you could continue
to use more memory without hitting another allocation
L221[14:40:13] <payonel> that is, you
probably have memory in reserve
L222[14:40:39] <Guest13_> if I didn't
spend those 7kb wouldn't I have even more memory in reserve?
L223[14:41:15] <payonel> lua allocates in
chunks and tries to be proactive
L224[14:42:17] <payonel> anyways, it's a
fine suggestion to use type() like you recommended
L225[14:42:19] <payonel> i'll use
that
L226[14:42:39] <Guest13_> I'm not sure if
you're trying to say that sometimes allocating 7kb might be more
efficient than not doing that. Which might be true, but likely less
probable than the opposite
L227[14:42:56] <Guest13_> thanks. that's
the first step
L228[14:43:30] <Guest13_> for the second
and the last step I need your approval to rollback my edit to the
wiki :)
L229[14:44:41] <payonel> i like how it is
currently, though
L230[14:44:53] <payonel> having just read
it
L231[14:46:02] <payonel> i might reword
the __call detail to use the previous wording, though
L232[14:46:12] <payonel> but that's just a
nit pick, i think it's good
L233[14:47:07] <payonel> if you are trying
to provide a vcomponent, and you don't want the all-in-one table
return to be the default, then you can design a dynamic table that
stores the full set only when needed
L234[14:47:19] <Guest13_> before, it just
said that it was an iterator, not mentioning the table (and thus,
not implying indexing syntax)
L235[14:47:32] <payonel> right, you've
made that aspect better
L237[14:47:52] <Guest13_> payonel, I tried
it. But then I'll probably have to override pairs() call somehow.
I'm not sure how to do that
L238[14:48:20] <payonel> there is
__pairs
L239[14:48:48] <Guest13_> and I really
want it to become just an iterator in the specs, so people will not
suppose table index syntax, so one day it may be implemented more
efficiently, and I can implement vcomponent more efficiently
today
L240[14:49:06] <Guest13_> payonel,
oh
L241[14:49:14] <Guest13_> I was looking
for it, but didn't find it. weird
L242[14:49:19] <payonel> again, the full
set table result is the natural base behavior
L243[14:49:26] <payonel> the iterator is
the extra
L244[14:50:07] <payonel> the name of the
method, list(), does imply an iterator
L245[14:50:30] <payonel> i'm just saying
we've traditionally used natural simple results in our api to the
machine
L246[14:50:45] <payonel> that maps more
naturally to other archs
L247[14:50:57] <S3> Iterators are stupid
usually anyways unless you make them yourself
L248[14:51:26] <S3> Iterators
fascinatingly enough are not functional
L249[14:51:57] <S3> But no big deal
L250[14:51:58] <Guest13_> ok that makes
sense I think
L251[14:52:40] <Guest13_> I think there
were no __pairs in lua5.1?
L252[14:52:49] <Guest13_> It's the docs I
was referring to
L253[14:53:00] <S3> Payonel perhaps will
look into will changes tonight, i ended up miles from telephone and
internet this weekend
L254[14:53:27] <S3> They they said there
was WiFi all i found was water trees and rocks lol
L255[14:53:46] <Guest13_> S3, first step:
punch the tree
L256[14:53:51] <S3> And a road that goes
for miles in the woods one car wide
L257[14:53:58] <S3> Omg lol
L258[14:54:07] <S3> That's hilarious
because i was on the ocean edge
L259[14:57:15] <Guest13_> yeah, it seems
__pairs was introduced in 5.2
L260[14:58:36] <Guest13_> now I can guess
what's the problem with luajit
L261[15:02:43] <Guest13_> payonel, I agree
with your point on other architectures. It then seems weird to
decide to provide iterator syntax at all, instead of letting ppl
use pairs() instead. But that's clearly unfixable at this point
without huge compatibility breakage
L262[15:05:03] <Guest13_> Is opencomputers
compatible with 5.1 though?
L263[15:06:11] <Guest13_> or lua5.3 is now
built-in?
L264[15:08:11] <payonel> is openos 5.1
compat? no
L265[15:08:15] <payonel> 5.2 and 5.3
only
L266[15:11:01] <Guest13_> i see) thx
L267[15:23:20] <Guest13_> btw are there
components that use component.fields()? maybe in other mods? what
component.fields() is supposed to do, actually?
L269[16:33:07] <MichiBot>
Meet the
World's Worst Carnivore, the Kinkajou | length:
4m 24s |
Likes:
783 Dislikes:
61 Views:
5,859 | by
SciShow |
Published On 18/6/2018
L270[16:42:45] <Inari> Is it kinky?
L271[16:47:06] <AmandaC> %choose more
anime for the anime affinity or later
L272[16:47:06] <MichiBot> AmandaC: more
anime for the anime affinity
L273[16:58:07]
<Wuerfel_21>
hm, there are apparently two tiers of wireless network card
now
L274[16:58:14]
<Wuerfel_21>
how do they differ?
L275[16:58:39] <Inari> By tier
L276[16:58:57]
<Wuerfel_21>
but what is the advantage of the T2 card
L277[17:00:11]
<Wuerfel_21>
or, seeing as the T2 card seem to be the old one, what is the
disadvantage of the T1 card
L278[17:00:13]
<Wuerfel_21>
or, seeing as the T2 card seem to be the old one, what is the
disadvantage of the T1 card? [Edited]
L279[17:06:04]
<Wuerfel_21>
apparently, it can only have one port open and has a low
range
L280[17:06:08]
<Wuerfel_21>
fair enough
L281[17:07:06]
<Wuerfel_21>
better question? how to raise GPU speed? the terminal feels kindof
slow
L283[17:13:13] <Izaya> oh hey gitlab don't
see that overly often around here
L284[17:13:31] <Orbstheorem> Gitlab
:D
L285[17:13:52] <Izaya> (well, not
gitlab.com, anyway)
L286[17:22:34] ⇦
Quits: Vexatos
(Vexatos!~Vexatos@p200300C1071794599C83B8E9435C1962.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
(Quit: Insert quantum chemistry joke here)
L288[17:33:40] <Orbstheorem> Oh :D
L289[17:36:55] <Guest13_> what's the
conversion rate for Simple Generators? 1:1, as for
BuildCraft?
L290[17:46:05] <Orbstheorem> Corded:
thanks to you now I know about MineOS :D
L291[17:46:26]
<MGR> Corded
is a bot
L292[17:46:30]
<MGR> It's a
bridge to Discord ?
L293[17:46:56] <Orbstheorem> Oh, then
Wuerfel_21
L294[17:46:58] <Orbstheorem> ^^
L295[17:54:03] ⇦
Quits: Tahg (Tahg!~Tahg@pool-173-76-165-7.bstnma.fios.verizon.net)
(Ping timeout: 194 seconds)
L296[17:58:25] <Izaya> MineOS is cool but
KOS NEO is cooler :^)
L297[18:00:22]
⇨ Joins: roos19365
(roos19365!~roos19365@gnusrv3.epfl.ch)
L298[18:00:40] <roos19365> This is sooo
awesome :D
L299[18:00:59] ⇦
Quits: roos19365 (roos19365!~roos19365@gnusrv3.epfl.ch) (Client
Quit)
L302[18:01:46] *
Temia pushes Wuerfel off a ledge
L303[18:26:11] ⇦
Quits: [] ([]!justastran@lightning.bouncer.ml) (Quit: I'm melting!
AHHHH)
L304[18:26:52]
⇨ Joins: Tahg
(Tahg!~Tahg@pool-173-76-165-7.bstnma.fios.verizon.net)
L305[19:03:45] ⇦
Quits: Inari (Inari!~Pinkishu@p5dec62f1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) (Quit:
'Multipass!')
L306[19:39:35] <Izaya> payonel: if I'm
writing an installer and want to have a bunch of optional stuff
should I have a menu with checkboxes or just a bunch of y/n
questions if I want it to fit well with OpenOS?
L307[19:58:45] <AmandaC> %tell Inari
damnit. The anime almost did the home run of magical
"girl" anime, but faltered at the end D:
L308[19:58:45] <MichiBot> AmandaC: Inari
will be notified of this message when next seen.
L310[20:17:27] <S3> I am back
L311[20:40:11]
⇨ Joins: Doty1154
(Doty1154!~Doty1154@c-73-189-164-179.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
L312[20:43:06]
⇨ Joins: Johannes13_
(Johannes13_!~Johannes1@dslb-094-216-149-092.094.216.pools.vodafone-ip.de)
L313[20:45:51] ⇦
Quits: Johannes13
(Johannes13!~Johannes1@dslb-094-216-182-054.094.216.pools.vodafone-ip.de)
(Ping timeout: 202 seconds)
L315[21:25:15] <Mimiru> It's not down...
it's alternative up... :P
L316[21:30:37]
⇨ Joins: CrimsonCrayon
(CrimsonCrayon!~crimsoncr@23-112-153-150.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net)
L317[21:32:39] ⇦
Quits: CrimsonCrayon
(CrimsonCrayon!~crimsoncr@23-112-153-150.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net)
(Client Quit)
L318[22:00:21]
⇨ Joins: CrimsonCrayon
(CrimsonCrayon!~crimsoncr@23-112-153-150.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net)
L319[22:00:57] <CrimsonCrayon> Is there
still a way to set resolution at boot? I have tried using
autorun.lua and rc.cfg with a script in rc.d.
L320[22:09:17] <Izaya> shrc
L321[22:09:31] <Izaya> That is to say,
/home/.shrc
L322[22:12:26] <CrimsonCrayon> Thank you
I'll take a look at that. Not executed as lua but as a shell
script?
L323[22:13:06] <Izaya> Aye
L324[22:13:15] <Izaya> Just throw
resolution x y straight into it
L325[22:13:24] <CrimsonCrayon> Cool thank
you that sounds easy
L326[22:13:27]
⇨ Joins: Renari
(Renari!~Renari@75.97.175.72.res-cmts.bgr.ptd.net)
L327[22:13:44] <CrimsonCrayon> oh one more
question....are multiple monitors possible on one computer?
L328[22:13:58] <CrimsonCrayon> so i could
have irc on one and a terminal in the other?
L329[22:14:59] <Izaya> Uuuuh
L330[22:15:09] <Izaya> Not under
OpenOS
L331[22:16:25] <CrimsonCrayon> ok thanks
again!
L332[22:16:36] ⇦
Quits: CrimsonCrayon
(CrimsonCrayon!~crimsoncr@23-112-153-150.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net)
(Quit: CrimsonCrayon)
L333[22:18:21]
⇨ Joins: CrimsonCrayon
(CrimsonCrayon!~crimsoncr@23-112-153-150.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net)
L334[22:18:32] <CrimsonCrayon> Yeah that
worked great thanks!
L335[22:21:45] ⇦
Quits: CrimsonCrayon
(CrimsonCrayon!~crimsoncr@23-112-153-150.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net)
(Remote host closed the connection)
L336[22:26:08]
<Kleadron>
how the heck do opencomputers cpus work
L337[22:26:21]
<Kleadron>
do they just change the code execution speed or something
L338[22:30:30] ⇦
Quits: Cervator
(Cervator!~Thunderbi@2601:4c1:4001:1d5d:2004:312d:f67d:326a)
(Remote host closed the connection)
L339[22:31:52]
<rater193>
hello
L340[22:52:54]
⇨ Joins: CrimsonCrayon
(CrimsonCrayon!~crimsoncr@23-112-153-150.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net)
L341[22:53:35] <CrimsonCrayon> ohhh
wocchat is cool
L342[23:05:51] ⇦
Quits: glasspelican
(glasspelican!~quassel@ktnron060ww-lp140-01-76-71-20-32.dsl.bell.ca)
(Ping timeout: 202 seconds)
L343[23:06:58]
⇨ Joins: glasspelican
(glasspelican!~quassel@ktnron060ww-lp140-03-50-100-174-130.dsl.bell.ca)
L344[23:28:40] ⇦
Quits: CrimsonCrayon
(CrimsonCrayon!~crimsoncr@23-112-153-150.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net)
(Quit: Proudly using WocChat!)
L345[23:29:14]
⇨ Joins: CrimsonCrayon
(CrimsonCrayon!~crimsoncr@23-112-153-150.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net)
L346[23:29:39] ⇦
Quits: CrimsonCrayon
(CrimsonCrayon!~crimsoncr@23-112-153-150.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net)
(Remote host closed the connection)
L347[23:29:42]
<Toothless the
Dragon> Whats the max amount of modem messages a computer can
handle?
L348[23:30:24]
<Toothless the
Dragon> Whats the max amount of modem messages a computer can
handle per second? [Edited]
L349[23:32:19]
⇨ Joins: CrimsonCrayon
(CrimsonCrayon!~crimsoncr@23-112-153-150.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net)
L350[23:34:35]
<Kodos> I
would assume it's one per tick. That's why you use an upgraded
relay
L351[23:35:04]
<Toothless the
Dragon> i maxed out my relay, and it only shows 4 a second
L352[23:35:15]
<Toothless the
Dragon> tier 3 cpu, and all
L353[23:36:01]
<Toothless the
Dragon> alright, i found a way to handle more traffic
L354[23:36:24]
<Toothless the
Dragon> basically trying to setup a graph of traffic, and it was
so limited using event.listen
L355[23:56:58] ⇦
Quits: Doty1154
(Doty1154!~Doty1154@c-73-189-164-179.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) (Read
error: Connection reset by peer)
L356[23:59:57] ⇦
Quits: CrimsonCrayon
(CrimsonCrayon!~crimsoncr@23-112-153-150.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net)
(Ping timeout: 182 seconds)